2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.apsusc.2010.10.115
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Mechanisms for nano particle removal in brush scrubber cleaning

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
15
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 33 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
0
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Among various methods used for post-CMP cleaning, the brush scrubbing method has been accepted as the most efficient way to remove contaminants. , In this method, a rotating poly­(vinyl alcohol) (PVA) brush (Figure a) is pressed onto a laterally rotating wafer in an aqueous environment. To improve the efficiency of scrubbing, various process conditions and methods have been explored. In addition, nanoparticle removal mechanisms have been studied from theoretical and experimental aspects. However, these previous efforts mostly focused on nanoparticle–wafer interactions so that phenomena and mechanisms related to nanoparticle–PVA interactions have not been well understood, especially on the nanometer scale.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Among various methods used for post-CMP cleaning, the brush scrubbing method has been accepted as the most efficient way to remove contaminants. , In this method, a rotating poly­(vinyl alcohol) (PVA) brush (Figure a) is pressed onto a laterally rotating wafer in an aqueous environment. To improve the efficiency of scrubbing, various process conditions and methods have been explored. In addition, nanoparticle removal mechanisms have been studied from theoretical and experimental aspects. However, these previous efforts mostly focused on nanoparticle–wafer interactions so that phenomena and mechanisms related to nanoparticle–PVA interactions have not been well understood, especially on the nanometer scale.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Removing them completely is the main task in post CMP cleaning. Polyvinyl acetate brush cleaning and megasonic cleaning are the commonly used methods . In cleaning process, when external force detaches the adhered particles from wafer, some particles are washed away by the flow, and meanwhile, some particles deposit to the wafer again .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Among several types of post-CMP cleaning processes, polyvinyl acetal (PVA) brush cleaning has been the most effective method for contaminant removal due to the physical force imposed by direct contact between the brush and wafer surface that also provides low cost of ownership (COO). [6][7][8] The contact elastic force, hydrodynamic drag force, and friction between brush and particles are the dominant removal forces during brush scrubbing. In the boundary lubrication regime, particles can be removed by both rolling and lifting, mainly due to van der Waals forces.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the boundary lubrication regime, particles can be removed by both rolling and lifting, mainly due to van der Waals forces. [8][9][10][11] Shear forces applied by brush scrubbing are inversely proportional to the radius of the particle, making it difficult to detach smaller nano-sized particles compared to large particles. 8 Many researchers have focused on defectivity after brush scrubbing and particle removal from the wafer surface as a function of the wafer-brush gap, pressure contour, rotation speed, and flow rate during scrubbing.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation