1998
DOI: 10.1016/s0022-0981(97)00253-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Mechanisms and consequences of intra- and interspecific interference competition in Idotea baltica (Pallas) and Idotea emarginata (Fabricius) (Crustacea: Isopoda): A laboratory study of possible proximate causes of habitat segregation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
46
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 44 publications
(46 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
0
46
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Earlier studies working on marine isopods were faced with the same problem, as severe antagonistic interference in I. baltica is known to occur already at low densities, causing high mortality on juveniles and individuals which are about to moult (Franke and Janke 1998). Thus, laboratory populations reach their carrying capacity at a low density even though all necessary resources are still available in excess ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Earlier studies working on marine isopods were faced with the same problem, as severe antagonistic interference in I. baltica is known to occur already at low densities, causing high mortality on juveniles and individuals which are about to moult (Franke and Janke 1998). Thus, laboratory populations reach their carrying capacity at a low density even though all necessary resources are still available in excess ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They provide both food and shelter from predators. Idotea baltica is capable of leaving this benthic habitat actively to escape from severe intra-or interspecific competition (Franke and Janke 1998). Passive dislocation appears along with macroalgae that become detached from their substratum and float to the surface.…”
Section: Behaviourmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They are distributed benthically along the coast from the supratidal down to subtidal habitats (Naylor 1972). The distribution of Idotea baltica and Idotea emarginata is primarily the result of interspecific competition and subsequent habitat segregation (Franke and Janke 1998). Although they prefer benthic habitats, all species also raft on floating objects at the sea surface; most of them, however, only sporadically.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, an overlap in trophic niches is expected as both consumers are known to feed on a variety of food sources, e.g. microalgae and detritus (Franke and Janke 1998;Blanchard et al 2000;Schanz et al 2002;Hagerthey et al 2002).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%