1982
DOI: 10.1101/sqb.1982.046.01.089
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Mechanism of Transformation by Rous Sarcoma Virus: Events within Adhesion Plaques

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
21
0

Year Published

1983
1983
1995
1995

Publication Types

Select...
4
4

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 33 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
1
21
0
Order By: Relevance
“…All of these molecules remained associated with the insoluble FACs after isolation and were found to be enriched in this fraction when compared with either whole cells, intact CSK, or a basal cell surface preparation that retains plasma membrane. pp125F and pp6Ov-src have been previously shown to localize within FACs by immunostaining (Rohrschneider et al, 1982;Schaller et al, 1992) and the Na+/H+ antiporter was found to codistribute with vinculin, talin, and F-actin in a recent report that used a different source of antibodies (Grinstein et al, 1993). Most importantly, we found the high affinity FGF receptor fig was not only present within the FAC, it was greatly enriched compared with either the whole cell or intact CSK.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 52%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…All of these molecules remained associated with the insoluble FACs after isolation and were found to be enriched in this fraction when compared with either whole cells, intact CSK, or a basal cell surface preparation that retains plasma membrane. pp125F and pp6Ov-src have been previously shown to localize within FACs by immunostaining (Rohrschneider et al, 1982;Schaller et al, 1992) and the Na+/H+ antiporter was found to codistribute with vinculin, talin, and F-actin in a recent report that used a different source of antibodies (Grinstein et al, 1993). Most importantly, we found the high affinity FGF receptor fig was not only present within the FAC, it was greatly enriched compared with either the whole cell or intact CSK.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 52%
“…It is well known that many viral tyrosine kinases (e.g., pp6Ov-src) localize to FACs in transformed cells (Cooper and Hunter, 1981;Kellie et al, 1986a,b;Tapley et al, 1989;Turner et al, 1989;Guan and Shalloway, 1992;Lipfert et al, 1992) and that phosphotyrosine (PTyr)-containing proteins localize to FACs within normal cells (Marchisio et al, 1984;Maher et al, 1985). Furthermore, one integrin-associated focal adhesion kinase, pp125FAK, exhibits both growth factor and ECM-dependent phosphorylation on tyrosine (Guan et al, 1991;Kornberg et al, 1992;Zachary and Rozengurt, 1992) and physically associates with pp6Oc-src via its SH2 domain when activated Xing et al, 1994;Cobb et al, 1994). pp125FAK is a substrate for pp6Ov-src, along with many other FAC proteins (Rohrschneider et al, 1982;Kellie et al, 1986b;Tapley et al, 1989;Guan and Shalloway, 1992) and a recent report suggests that integrin-dependent phosphorylation of pp125FAK may link integrin engagement to the Ras/MAP kinase signal transduction pathway via creation of an SH2-binding site for GRB2 (Schlaepfer et al, 1994). The distribution of ppl25FAK within FACs as well as its ability to be activated by growth factors appears, however, to be more dependent on its associations with the actin CSK (Lipfert et al, 1992;Rankin and Rozengurt, 1994).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The localization of p36 in the transformed cells was distinctly different from that of pp60 v-src, which was found in focal areas on the undersurface of cells that presumably correspond to the adhesion plaques or focal contacts reported by others (Fig. 7E) (34,35) and in the plasma membranes at cell-cell contacts in dense cultures (not shown).…”
Section: Downloaded Frommentioning
confidence: 83%
“…We do not regard these observations as contradictory, since it is unlikely that more than a small proportion of pp6(V-SrC (ca. 10%) is actually congregated in adhesion plaques (35). ocalization of p36 by immunofluorescence microscopy.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Available evidence suggests that it is the tyrosine phosphokinase activity of pp6OSrc that is responsible for the transforming effect of RSV (41). Although the mechanism by which pp60sr, exerts its transformation is unclear, studies utilizing mutants of RSV have indicated a correlation between tyrosine phosphorylation of vinculin, loss of actin-containing stress fibers, and the ability to grow in soft agar (38,42). This suggests that the altered growth characteristics of transformed cells result partly from alterations in the cytoskeleton brought about via a mechanism involving the phosphorylation of vinculin at tyrosine residues.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%