Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

1980
1980
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 119 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…of Chemical Engineering, Monash University, Clayton, Victoria, Australia 3 168. versity of Melbourne, Australia. The method of preparation has been described (Anderson et al, 1980). The available sample was acid-washed with hydrochloric acid, held at a temperature of 175°C for 4 h and calcined at 500°C.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…of Chemical Engineering, Monash University, Clayton, Victoria, Australia 3 168. versity of Melbourne, Australia. The method of preparation has been described (Anderson et al, 1980). The available sample was acid-washed with hydrochloric acid, held at a temperature of 175°C for 4 h and calcined at 500°C.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The increase in EB conversion was observed using xylene mixed EB feed. It is reported that, ethylbenzene conversion and the yield of p-DEB increase with the enhancement in m-xylene concentration [20]. The increase in EB conversion was observed, in the presence of air as represented in Table 2.…”
Section: Feed and Product Analysismentioning
confidence: 68%
“…Since the channel dimensions of modified zeolite are comparable to those of reactant ethylbenzene and product di-ethylbenzenes and benzene, micro-pore diffusion resistance cannot be avoided. Similar kinetic studies were reported for toluene ethylation [20], isomerization of ethylbenzene and m-xylene [22], disproportionation of toluene [23,24], methylation of toluene [25] and disproportionation ethylbenzene [26][27][28]. Ethylbenzene disproportionation was carried out at three different temperatures viz: 583, 603 and 623 K, over HZSM-5TS catalyst in the presence of air as carrier gas to collect the kinetic data.…”
Section: Reaction Kineticsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In contrast to the catalytic activity of MCM-41 doped or undoped with Al and/or Ti, the conversion of oxygen at less than 3% and the selectivity to COx were almost negligible while the conversions of C 3 H 6 were relatively greater than those on MCM-41 and related catalysts. This indicates that the oxidation reaction hardly proceeded on H-ZSM-5 and related catalysts since it is generally accepted that these catalysts are active for cracking, aromatization, isomerization, and successive reactions via these three reactions [20][21][22]. Therefore, since these catalyst systems did not possess the ability for an oxidation reaction, the small amount of PO that was produced did not suffer from deep oxidation to COx to show a relatively greater yield of PO of up to 0.67% on H-ZSM-5(23.8) at P(O 2 ) = 16.4 kPa.…”
Section: Catalytic Performances On H-zsm-5 Doped and Undoped With Namentioning
confidence: 99%