Two-year-old branches on control trees (Pins strobus L.) were compared through a season with branches on trees stem-girdled just above, or below, the branch whorL AU branches first sagged down for 20 days and then moved up for 40 days. Then, control branches reversed and moved back down while branches in both girdle treatments continued to move up. Movement reversal correlated with cessation of both elongation and diameter growth in control branches. Diameter growth continued in branches of girdled trees. Control branches continued to stiffen even after diameter growth stopped. Dffferences in movements due to gdling are from compression wood formed after cessation of branch elongation. Apical control stops cambial activity and compression wood formation in branches after branch elongation ceases, allowing photosynthate produced in the branch to move to the stem. Control branches bend down from increasing selfweight after cambial activity ceases.In white pine (Pinus strobus L.) and most conifers, when the terminal shoot is intact, the lateral branches gradually sag downward over the years. When the terminal shoot is injured or when the stem is girdled above a branch, the uppermost branch bends upward to replace the terminal (4,7,14,15). This bending is from compression wood action in older portions ofthe branch, not from geotropic bending of elongating shoots (16,17). The overall result of bending is well known, but the dynamics of the process has been studied only in stems (1, 2). Apical control decreases diameter growth in white pine branches (15), but Munch (7) stated that girdles below a branch increased cambial activity without affecting branch movements, suggesting that movement and cambial activity are controlled separately. The present paper describes the results of stem girdling experiments to modify apical control of the movements of the 2-year-old portion of 2-year-old branches during their third growing season. We also followed changes in mechanical factors that affect bending and branch movements