2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.fusengdes.2021.112840
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Mechanical support concept of the DEMO breeding blanket

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…More recently, a concept for the BB attachment has been developed taking advantage of the ferromagnetic force that acts on the ferromagnetic BB material EUROFER, caused by the radial decay of the toroidal magnetic field, which pulls each BB towards the IB with a large radial force [55]. This concept relies on a set of vertical, toroidal and radial supports (see [56,57]), and is claimed to result in a significant reduction of in-vessel design complexity and RH operations. Figure 26 depicts this concept, where it is illustrated with the 200 mm wide DSC (in pink).…”
Section: Blanket Attachment Concept (Blanket Support Structure)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…More recently, a concept for the BB attachment has been developed taking advantage of the ferromagnetic force that acts on the ferromagnetic BB material EUROFER, caused by the radial decay of the toroidal magnetic field, which pulls each BB towards the IB with a large radial force [55]. This concept relies on a set of vertical, toroidal and radial supports (see [56,57]), and is claimed to result in a significant reduction of in-vessel design complexity and RH operations. Figure 26 depicts this concept, where it is illustrated with the 200 mm wide DSC (in pink).…”
Section: Blanket Attachment Concept (Blanket Support Structure)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In [23], the BB deformation was estimated. The BB segments were assumed to be vertically constrained to the VV on the bottom [25] and their thermal expansion was allowed, to some degree, on the top by the assembly gaps. According to the outcomes of [24], the pipe interfaces of the inboard segments (location "BB side" in Figure 6) were predicted to move upwards by 70 mm and those on the outboard segments by 110 mm (Table 3).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%