2014
DOI: 10.1007/s10853-014-8665-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Mechanical properties and thermal conductivity of graphene nanoplatelet/epoxy composites

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

29
245
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 361 publications
(274 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
29
245
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This confirms the poor interfacial bonding between the epoxy and nanoparticles. These results are similar to Wang et al [75] and King et al [76] although the value was slightly higher than is found in this paper. This may be due to the curing process, the dispersion method, or the specific type of GNP used, confirming that every single modification in the manufacture of GNP based epoxy nanocomposites have an impact of the mechanical properties.…”
Section: Reference Samples: Raw Gnp/epoxysupporting
confidence: 93%
“…This confirms the poor interfacial bonding between the epoxy and nanoparticles. These results are similar to Wang et al [75] and King et al [76] although the value was slightly higher than is found in this paper. This may be due to the curing process, the dispersion method, or the specific type of GNP used, confirming that every single modification in the manufacture of GNP based epoxy nanocomposites have an impact of the mechanical properties.…”
Section: Reference Samples: Raw Gnp/epoxysupporting
confidence: 93%
“…For a high content of graphene, polymer composite possesses better interfacial compatibility, which favors phonon transport [28], and thus increases thermal conductivity. Similar conclusions in thermal conductivity of epoxy matrix was previously reported by [27,29]. Homogeneous dispersion of fillers improves the hardness of the polymer coating.…”
Section: Characterization Of the Composite Coatingsupporting
confidence: 88%
“…It should be mentioned that different T g values have been reported for the same materials, which can be the result of incorporating different methods of analysis [20], neglecting the effect of fillers on the degree and nature of crystallinity of the matrix [20], or different methods of preparation [224]. Graphene nanoplatelet (GNP)-5 5 wt% Epoxy VDW Strength~− 60% [178] Noncovalent functionalized graphene flakes 0.25 wt% Epoxy Improved interaction Strength + 75% [179] a Copolymers of styrene and p-chloromethylstyrene…”
Section: Glass Transition (T G )mentioning
confidence: 99%