2017
DOI: 10.3390/cryst7080254
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Mechanical Anisotropy in Austenitic NiMnGa Alloy: Nanoindentation Studies

Abstract: Abstract:Mechanical anisotropy in an austenitic ferromagnetic shape memory alloy (SMA), Ni 50 Mn 26.25 Ga 23.75 , is investigated along (010), 120 , 121 , 231 and (232) using nanoindentation. While (010) exhibits the highest reduced modulus, E r , and hardness, H, (232) shows the lowest amongst the grain orientations examined in this study. The significant elastic anisotropy measured is attributed to differences in planar packing density and number of in-plane Ni-Mn and Ni-Ga bonds, whereas the plastic anisot… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Alloys undergoing thermoelastic martensitic phase transformations (TMPTs) have a great innovative potential for a variety of structural and functional applications due to the effects of shape memory (SM), giant superelasticity (GS), elastic- and magnetocaloric (EMC) and other phenomena [ 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 , 5 , 6 , 7 , 8 , 9 , 10 ]. Notable among these alloys, of course, are the atomically ordered L 2 1 Heusler alloys, which exhibit a ferromagnetic ordering below the Curie temperature T C [ 10 , 11 , 12 , 13 , 14 , 15 , 16 , 17 , 18 , 19 ]. For alloy compositions with the electron concentration e / a < 7.7, TMPT occurs from a ferromagnetic parent phase (i.e., M s < T C , where M s is the temperature at the start of martensitic transformation).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Alloys undergoing thermoelastic martensitic phase transformations (TMPTs) have a great innovative potential for a variety of structural and functional applications due to the effects of shape memory (SM), giant superelasticity (GS), elastic- and magnetocaloric (EMC) and other phenomena [ 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 , 5 , 6 , 7 , 8 , 9 , 10 ]. Notable among these alloys, of course, are the atomically ordered L 2 1 Heusler alloys, which exhibit a ferromagnetic ordering below the Curie temperature T C [ 10 , 11 , 12 , 13 , 14 , 15 , 16 , 17 , 18 , 19 ]. For alloy compositions with the electron concentration e / a < 7.7, TMPT occurs from a ferromagnetic parent phase (i.e., M s < T C , where M s is the temperature at the start of martensitic transformation).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…During cooling below M s , these alloys exhibit a sequence of first-order phase transitions from the parent cubic L 2 1 phase to long-period modulated intermediate martensite structures (denoted as 10 M and 14 M ), as well as to tetragonal 2 M martensite without lattice modulation [ 5 ]. A significant key limitation for wide practical application is the brittleness and poor machinability of ferromagnetic and other polycrystalline SM alloys, with the exception of titanium nickelide [ 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 , 16 , 18 , 20 ]. The high brittleness of Ni 2 MnGa-based alloys even in a single-crystalline state represents an obvious obstacle for realization of SM, GS, and other related effects.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%