2004
DOI: 10.1002/adfm.200305078
|Get access via publisher |Summarize |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts

Mechanical and Structural Properties of BaCrO4 Nanorod Films under Confinement and Shear

Abstract: Using an X‐ray surface forces apparatus (X‐SFA) we have investigated the effects of normal load (stress) and shear on the ordering and tribological properties of 10 nm × 30 nm surfactant‐coated BaCrO4 nanorods in isooctane, confined within submicrometer films. The film structure and corresponding friction forces were monitored as a function of time and shearing distance at different gap sizes and loads. The X‐ray diffraction patterns indicate a cubic phase of nanorods coexisting with a surfactant phase that de… Show more

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
16
4
3
2

Citation Types

0
18
0
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
21
2
1

Relationship

1
23

Authors

Journals

citations

Cited by 24 publications

(18 citation statements)
references

References 16 publications

0
18
0
0
Order By: Relevance
How this paper cites the one you are viewing
“…This quantization is related to the oscillatory (normal) forces between any two smooth surfaces immersed in simple liquids, [7] and it often leads to undesirable stick-slip sliding. [18] Addition of the surfactant-coated nanorods to the liquid changed both the normal and friction forces, both quantitatively and qualitatively, depending on the nanorod concentration c. First, as previously found in nanorod solutions, [19] the normal forces were monotonically repulsive and, in dry liquid, roughly exponential, as previously also found with other trapped nanoparticles. Depending on the nanorod concentration c, steric 'hard walls' were encountered at separations ranging from n = 0 to approximately 10 nanorod diameters (layers), increasing in thickness with increasing c. The film thicknesses and refractive indices, r i of compressed nanorod films were typically D = 14.7 nm, r i = 2.5 ± 0.1, and D = 2.5 nm, r i = 2.2 ± 0.1 in the range of visible wavelengths.…”
mentioning
confidence: 59%