2013
DOI: 10.1088/0004-637x/773/1/47
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Measuring the Rotational Periods of Isolated Magnetic White Dwarfs

Abstract: We present time-series photometry of 30 isolated magnetic white dwarfs, surveyed with the Jacobus Kapteyn Telescope between 2002 August and 2003 May. We find that 9 were untestable due to varying comparison stars, but of the remaining 21, 5 (24%) are variable with reliably derived periods, while a further 9 (43%) are seen to vary during our study, but we were unable to derive the period. We interpret the variability to be the result of rotation of the objects. We find no correlation between rotation period and… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
89
2

Year Published

2014
2014
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 93 publications
(98 citation statements)
references
References 82 publications
4
89
2
Order By: Relevance
“…For the MWD members, the calculated data pair (ρ, P) are indicated by triangles in Figure 7, with the solid line of best fit drawn though the triangles. We have taken the period of WD1829 + 547 to be 100 years, the minimum value estimated via measurement as reported in [52]. It is rather surprising that though a huge gap is missing in the range of P (10 6 -10 9 s), the measured/deduced data point from other groups over the years follow a straight line according to our model.…”
Section: White Dwarfs (Wd) and Magnetic White Dwarfs (Mwd) With Mass mentioning
confidence: 82%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…For the MWD members, the calculated data pair (ρ, P) are indicated by triangles in Figure 7, with the solid line of best fit drawn though the triangles. We have taken the period of WD1829 + 547 to be 100 years, the minimum value estimated via measurement as reported in [52]. It is rather surprising that though a huge gap is missing in the range of P (10 6 -10 9 s), the measured/deduced data point from other groups over the years follow a straight line according to our model.…”
Section: White Dwarfs (Wd) and Magnetic White Dwarfs (Mwd) With Mass mentioning
confidence: 82%
“…Similarly, we shall analyze some data of some isolated magnetic white dwarfs (MWD) [50] [52]. We list the surface magnetic induction field reported instead of effective surface T in Table 9 for MWD, together with other parameters similar to that for the WD case.…”
Section: White Dwarfs (Wd) and Magnetic White Dwarfs (Mwd) With Mass mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, planets of sub-Jupiter to Jupiter size, if they are abundant at these orbits around WDs, could explain three or four cases. Figure 8 shows the seven periods and amplitudes we have measured, along with the ground-based measurements by Brinkworth et al (2004Brinkworth et al ( , 2005Brinkworth et al ( , 2013, for 10 magnetic WDs with fairly precise rotation periods (out of 23 WDs monitored by them, 14 of them with sensitivity to periods of up to a week). Also plotted is a point for the T = 34, 000 K DA WD BOKS53856, for which Holberg & Howell (2011) have measured, using Kepler, amplitude A = 2.5% variations with a period P = 0.255 day.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is known that the magnetic fields of Magnetic White Dwarfs are non-dipolar and distributed irregularly [40]. Thus to produce a magnetic field of (6) later.…”
Section: K T ∼mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Taking 7 Magnetic Whit Dwarf (MWD) samples [40] [55] [56] with close mass density values, we plot the B-P graph in Figure 28, using data in Table 8 Table 8, we show the M-R graph in Figure 30 giving a slope of −1.159. Substituting therefore the following equation (Figure not shown), the slope is negative and the magnitude is rather large, within a range −58 to −62, being consistent to Equation (6.8.5), though the data points are rather scattered.…”
Section: Magnetic White Dwarfsmentioning
confidence: 99%