2019
DOI: 10.1093/cid/ciz096
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Measuring the Financial Burden of Resistance: What Should Be Compared?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

2
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 6 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This approach means that different types of infections (MDR or non-MDR Pseudomonas aeruginosa ) were compared to uninfected controls. Previous studies often directly compared MDR and non-MDR cases [35], which implies the assumption of the so-called “replacement scenario”: It assumes that every infection caused by resistant bacteria would be replaced by an infection caused by more susceptible bacteria if the spread of resistant pathogens was prevented [3638]. Yet antibiotic resistance does not only increase the burden of infections: It is also responsible for the onset of infection through the failure of antibiotic prophylaxis [39].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This approach means that different types of infections (MDR or non-MDR Pseudomonas aeruginosa ) were compared to uninfected controls. Previous studies often directly compared MDR and non-MDR cases [35], which implies the assumption of the so-called “replacement scenario”: It assumes that every infection caused by resistant bacteria would be replaced by an infection caused by more susceptible bacteria if the spread of resistant pathogens was prevented [3638]. Yet antibiotic resistance does not only increase the burden of infections: It is also responsible for the onset of infection through the failure of antibiotic prophylaxis [39].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%