2010
DOI: 10.1644/09-mamm-a-313.1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Measuring sex-biased dispersal in social mammals: comparisons of nuclear and mitochondrial genes in collared peccaries

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
7
0
1

Year Published

2014
2014
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 58 publications
1
7
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Las especies más abundantes durante el estudio fueron P. tajacu y N. narica, posiblemente como resultado del comportamiento de ambas especies, ya que las hembras adultas y los individuos jóvenes forman grupos sociales (Cooper, Waser, Gopurenko, Hellgren, Gabor, & Dewoody, 2010;Logan, & Longino, 2013). Los resultados de abundancia relativa coinciden con lo reportado por Monroy-Vilchis et al (2011) y Pérez-Irineo, & Santos Moreno (2012, donde el coatí es una especie muy abundante.…”
Section: Discussionunclassified
“…Las especies más abundantes durante el estudio fueron P. tajacu y N. narica, posiblemente como resultado del comportamiento de ambas especies, ya que las hembras adultas y los individuos jóvenes forman grupos sociales (Cooper, Waser, Gopurenko, Hellgren, Gabor, & Dewoody, 2010;Logan, & Longino, 2013). Los resultados de abundancia relativa coinciden con lo reportado por Monroy-Vilchis et al (2011) y Pérez-Irineo, & Santos Moreno (2012, donde el coatí es una especie muy abundante.…”
Section: Discussionunclassified
“…Both sexes were dispersed similarly between both populations, which could augment gene flow among populations of T. pecari. In contrast to the absence of sex-biased dispersal in T. pecari, comparisons of the level of genetic differentiation between mtDNA and microsatellites revealed male-biased dispersal in populations of collared peccaries from Texas (Cooper et al, 2010). Thus, this second species could show higher levels of genetic heterogeneity than the white-lipped peccary.…”
Section: Genetic Heterogeneity and No Existence Of Subspecies Within mentioning
confidence: 75%
“…Sex‐biased dispersal may be related to social mating systems (Mabry et al, 2013) and result in different gene frequencies between sexes within and among populations or subpopulations (Prout, 1981). Recently, various studies reported intersexual differences in fine‐scale spatial genetic structure in mammals (e.g., Banks & Peakall, 2012; Cooper et al, 2010; Ishibashi, Zenitani, & Saitoh, 2013; Peakall, Ruibal, & Lindenmayer, 2003; Temple, Hoffman, & Amos, 2006). Therefore, it is highly likely that, in mammals, several mtDNA‐based subpopulations, which are shaped by female philopatry, are nested within an ncDNA‐based population, in which the mtDNA‐based subpopulations are linked by male dispersal.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%