2016
DOI: 10.1080/21681015.2016.1172522
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Measuring schedule uncertainty for a stochastic resource-constrained project using scenario-based approach with utility-entropy decision model

Abstract: The aim of this study is to propose a scenario-based approach with utility-entropy decision model to measure the uncertainty related to the evolution of a resource-constrained project scheduling problem with uncertain activity durations (a stochastic RCPSP). The approach consists of two stages. The first is to apply the proposal proposed by Tseng and Ko to convert a stochastic RCPSP into a full scenario tree. In stage two, we introduce the Expected UtilityEntropy (EU-E) decision model, a weighted linear averag… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For better understanding, the key steps of Algorithm 2 (steps 18 to 22) are further explained with an example. Assume that, due to the first disruption event at time t = 10, the set of affected and unaffected activities of a project with 7 tasks are: I af f ected = [4,5,6,7] and I unaf f ected = [1,2,3]. Now, after executing step 13, the affected activities are sorted based on their descending order of rt i , and it becomes 6−4−5−7.…”
Section: ) Modified Neh Heuristicmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…For better understanding, the key steps of Algorithm 2 (steps 18 to 22) are further explained with an example. Assume that, due to the first disruption event at time t = 10, the set of affected and unaffected activities of a project with 7 tasks are: I af f ected = [4,5,6,7] and I unaf f ected = [1,2,3]. Now, after executing step 13, the affected activities are sorted based on their descending order of rt i , and it becomes 6−4−5−7.…”
Section: ) Modified Neh Heuristicmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The project also faces a disruption since after executing 2 units of time, the actual duration of the activity 2 is changed from 8 units to 3 units of time and its resource consumption is decreased from 4 units to 1 unit. The actual activity durations for the execution phase are [0, 6,4,6,3,8,3,0]. The makespan for real-time approach is 44 (sequence: 1-2-4-3-5-6-7-8) which is equal to the makespan obtain for the right shifting approach.…”
Section: F Proposed Igfbid For Rcpspds (Managing Disruption)mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In a recent study, Ref. [ 10 ] measure the uncertainty related to the evolution of a resource-constrained project scheduling problem with uncertain activity durations using the entropy concept. Ref.…”
Section: Managing Projectsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Initially, priority list are generated by a GRASP algorithm, and subsequently, the precedence constraints are created by a GA. Recently, in 2016, Tseng and Ko (2016) presented a two-stages procedure: in the first stage, a scenario tree is generated, and in the second stage, the worst branches are eliminated using the Expected Utility-Entropy criteria.…”
Section: Special Procedures Based On Stage-by-stage Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%