Measuring health workers’ motivation in rural health facilities: baseline results from three study districts in Zambia

Abstract

IntroductionHealth worker motivation can potentially affect the provision of health services. Low morale among the workforce can undermine the quality of service provision and drive workers away from the profession. While the presence of high-quality, motivated staff is a key aspect of health system performance, it is also one of the most difficult factors to measure.MethodsWe assessed health worker motivation as part of the baseline assessment for a health system strengthening intervention in three rural districts in Zambia. The intervention (Better Health Outcomes Through Mentoring and Assessment (BHOMA)) aims to increase health worker motivation through training, mentoring and support. We assessed motivation by examining underlying issues grouped around relevant outcome constructs such as job satisfaction, general motivation, burnout, organization commitment, conscientiousness and timeliness that collectively measure overall levels of motivation. The tools and the concepts have been used in high-income countries and they were recently applied in African settings to measure health worker motivation.ResultsFemale participants had the highest motivation scores (female: mean 78.5 (SD 7.8) vs male: mean (SD 7.0)). By type of worker, nurses had the highest scores while environmental health technicians had the lowest score (77.4 (SD 7.8 vs 73.2 (SD 9.3)). Health workers who had been in post longer also had higher scores (>7 months). Health workers who had received some form of training in the preceding 12 months were more likely to have a higher score; this was also true for those older than 40 years when compared to those less than 40 years of age. The highest score values were noted in conscientiousness and timeliness, with all districts scoring above 80.ConclusionsThis study evaluated motivation among rural health workers using a simple adapted tool to measure the concept of motivation. Results showed variation in motivation score by sex, type of health worker, training and time in post. Further research is needed to establish why these health worker attributes were associated with motivation and whether health system interventions targeting health workers, such as the current intervention, could influence health worker motivation.

Strengthening Strategic Reward Framework in Health Systems: A Survey of Narok County, Kenya

“…Findings were similar to those made in District hospitals in Kenya where studies reported that the majority of respondents strongly agreed to being hard workers and disagreed that they were often absent from work, while many participants described themselves as demotivated (Mbindyo et al, 2009). Similar findings were also made in three districts in Zambia where it was found that, overall, HWs agreed that they were satisfied with their jobs and were commited to their organization, while conscientiousness, timeliness, and attendance had the highest scores (Mutale et al, 2013).…”

Human resources for health development: toward realizing Universal Health Coverage in Japan

“…This phenomenon meant that the GOJ began establishing schools throughout the country, although the quality of education in such nursing schools varied. "Those who had stayed longer in rural areas had settled and integrated well within their community" (20); therefore, it can be said that the local recruitment of students is important for staff retention in remote areas. However, it is important to consider how these schools are distributed, because it has been reported that this increase in nursing institutions could only be accomplished by deepening geographical imbalances in human resource distribution (7).…”

Use of Balanced Scorecard Methodology for Performance Measurement of the Health Extension Program in Ethiopia

“…"Human resources development" domain included five indicators measuring workforce knowledge, in-service training in the past 1 year, perception and satisfaction (regarding working and living conditions), and retention of health workers, which all affect quality of care. [35][36][37][38][39] "Community engagement" domain refers to the process of involving the community in decision making and service provision and included four indicators. The basic philosophy of HEP was to ensure community ownership and responsibility for maintaining their own health, which along with the increased expectation for health equity contribute to performance improvement.…”