Measuring Engineering Faculty Views about Benefits and Costs of Using Student-Centered Strategies

Abstract

Abstract-Dispositions of 286 engineering faculty members were assessed to determine views about three student-centered classroom strategies and how frequently faculty used those strategies. The student-centered classroom strategies examined were: using formative feedback to adjust instruction, integrating real-world applications, and promoting student-to-student discussions during formal class time. The Value, Expectancy, and Cost of Testing Educational Reforms Survey (VECTERS), based on expectancy theory, was designed, tested, and validated for this purpose. Results indicate using strategies, such as formative feedback, are significantly tied to perceived benefits and expectation of success. Using student-centered strategies is inversely related to the perceived cost of implementation -with more frequent users perceiving lower cost of time and materials.

How Research, Teaching, and Leadership Roles are Recommended to Male and Female Engineering Faculty Differently

“…This exists in the face of the circumstances of female STEM faculty spending more time teaching and spending comparatively less time on research than male faculty (Carrigan et al 2011). At the same time, male engineering faculty are less optimistic than female engineering faculty regarding the value of student-centered teaching strategies that often require more planning time and classroom resources (Judson et al 2017;Ross and Judson 2018). Yet despite women spending more time teaching and placing greater emphasis on promoting student-centered classrooms, STEM students often perceive male faculty as more capable.…”

Publishing Student-Generated Problems in an OER

“…While most engineering faculty embrace using real-world applications in their classroom [1], the degree to which the real world is incorporated varies. Typically in fundamental engineering courses, the real-world application is represented by examples and homework problems with succinct problem statements that are solved with a system model, free-body diagram, and mathematical model [2].…”

Board 133: Scaling and Assessment of an Evidence-Based Faculty Development Program for Promoting Active Learning Pedagogical Strategies

“…In fact, nearly all respondents (98%) reported using both active learning strategies and learning objectives at the end of the JTFD program. The Value, Expectancy, and Cost for Testing Educational Reforms Survey (VECTERS) was designed by members of the project team to assess faculty dispositions towards and use of specific active learning strategies [12]. The instrument focused on three particular active learning strategies: (a) formative feedback to adjust instruction, (b) integrating real-world applications, and (c) facilitating student-to-student discussions in class.…”