2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.dss.2015.02.006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Measuring consumers' willingness to pay with utility-based recommendation systems

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
24
0
2

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
4

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 45 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 66 publications
0
24
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Consumers who are not willing to evaluate all available products need only compare the top-ranked products and select one alternative holistically. Hence, recommender systems are commonly evaluated based on holistic product ratings (Scholz et al, 2015;Xiao and Benbasat, 2007;Herlocker et al, 2004).…”
Section: Analysis and Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Consumers who are not willing to evaluate all available products need only compare the top-ranked products and select one alternative holistically. Hence, recommender systems are commonly evaluated based on holistic product ratings (Scholz et al, 2015;Xiao and Benbasat, 2007;Herlocker et al, 2004).…”
Section: Analysis and Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…MAVT-based recommender systems estimate consumer-specific values for all products of a given category at the time of purchase (Huang, 2011;Pu et al, 2011;Scholz et al, 2015), based on individual value functions and attribute weights. The first characteristic of ideal MAVT-based recommender systems, is therefore reliable estimation of attribute weights.…”
Section: Measuring Attribute Weights In Mavt-based Recommender Systemsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The recommendation system [25,26] guesses the consumer shopping preferences according to the characteristics of products that the consumers purchased in the past, and then recommends similar products to him or her [27]. However, a pure CBF system also has its limitations.…”
Section: The Recommendation System and Hybrid Algorithmmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The fourth method is the utility-based recommendation. For instance, Scholz et al (2015) [19] found that exponential utility functions are better geared to predicting optimal recommendation ranks for products, and linear utility functions perform much better in estimating customers' willingness.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%