2022
DOI: 10.3390/ani12121494
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Measuring Annual Variation in Reproductive Output Reveals a Key Role of Maternal Body Condition in Determining the Size of Eggs in Snakes

Abstract: Long-term studies are especially suited for disentangling the effects of extrinsic and intrinsic factors on both total reproductive investment and reproductive allocation in offspring number versus offspring size. Female reproductive traits of the red-banded wolf snake (Lycodon rufozonatus) from Zhejiang, East China were studied in four years between 1999 and 2014. Egg-laying dates overall extended from late June to late July, and varied among years. Postpartum body mass, clutch size, clutch mass, and egg size… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

1
1
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 51 publications
1
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In other reptiles, such as sand lizards, Lacerta agilis , the offspring size is negatively correlated with the offspring number, which implies a diversity of offspring size-number trade-off effects among taxa [ 39 ]. In fact, we also found no evidence of a trade-off between the clutch size and offspring size, which was similar to the study in the red-banded wolf snakes, Lycodon rufozonatus [ 40 ].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 90%
“…In other reptiles, such as sand lizards, Lacerta agilis , the offspring size is negatively correlated with the offspring number, which implies a diversity of offspring size-number trade-off effects among taxa [ 39 ]. In fact, we also found no evidence of a trade-off between the clutch size and offspring size, which was similar to the study in the red-banded wolf snakes, Lycodon rufozonatus [ 40 ].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 90%
“…We calculated relative litter mass by dividing litter mass by the postpartum female mass (Shine, 1992). We calculated the coefficient of variation [= 100 × (standard deviation/mean) to estimate within-litter offspring size variability; Guo et al, 2022]. To account for the influence of female size on fecundity (litter size), we calculated relative fecundity by using the residuals derived from the regression of litter size against female SVL (Olsson and Shine, 1997).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Post-laying females were weighed and measured for SVL. We calculated relative clutch mass (RCM) by dividing clutch mass by the post-laying female mass and used the coefficient of variation [CV = 100 × (standard deviation/mean)] to estimate withinclutch egg size variability (Guo et al, 2022).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%