2016 IEEE Symposium Series on Computational Intelligence (SSCI) 2016
DOI: 10.1109/ssci.2016.7849895
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Measuring agreement on linguistic expressions in medical treatment scenarios

Abstract: Abstract-Quality of life assessment represents a key process of deciding treatment success and viability. As such, patients' perceptions of their functional status and well-being are important inputs for impairment assessment. Given that patient completed questionnaires are often used to assess patient status and determine future treatment options, it is important to know the level of agreement of the words used by patients and different groups of medical professionals. In this paper, we propose a measure call… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
(34 reference statements)
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As each α-cut of a normal and convex fuzzy set is a closed interval [22], we aim to extend the proposed similarity measure for comparing fuzzy sets. …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As each α-cut of a normal and convex fuzzy set is a closed interval [22], we aim to extend the proposed similarity measure for comparing fuzzy sets. …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The agreement ratio, Alg (2), proposed by Navarro et al [12] is a measure within the range of 0 and 1 of the agreement amongst the data sources (e.g. experts) that have provided their opinion as intervals.…”
Section: Agreement Ratiomentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These weights help the decision-making process becomes more robust and less sensitive to dispersed opinions of the decision-makers. In addition, finding the level of agreement of decision-makers has always been important in decision-making processes [19]. We use a bi-level optimisation model to find the weights of the criteria as Eq.…”
Section: Stage 2: Decision Matrix Construction 1) Construct the Decismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…, for all (18) 3) Determine the ranking score Once the distances from ideal solutions are calculated for all alternatives, a ranking score ( % ) can be formulated based on how much an alternative is close to the positive ideal solution and distant from the negative ideal solution as Eq. (19).…”
Section: ) Define Ideal Solutionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation