“…We examined several possible reasons for this situation [16], for example, the energy deposits in Au(Si) surface barrier detector used to detect backscattered protons due to tritium β-decay electrons and neutrons produced in the reaction T(p,n) 3 He when the incident energy of proton was larger than the threshold energy, 1.02 MeV, and possible inaccuracy of non-Rutherford backscattering (non-RBS) cross sections of T(p,p)T. We observed that these possible reasons can not explain the disagreement between the experimental EPBS spectra and the fitting spectra given by SIMNRA code at the low-energy part for tritium analysis. Moreover, we noticed that SIMNRA code utilizes Rutherford backscattering (RBS) cross sections, instead of non-RBS cross sections which are usually one to three orders of magnitude larger than RBS cross sections ( in particular for tritium, the ratio of non-RBS cross sections to RBS cross sections can be ~1000 at ~3.5 MeV [7]), to calculate the dual scattering contributions for non-RBS light elements (e.g., T, 4 He, 12 C, 14 N, 16 O, nat Si and so on). For small-angle scattering, non-RBS cross sections tend to be equal to RBS cross sections, therefore whether non-RBS cross sections or RBS cross sections are used are not important in this case.…”