2008
DOI: 10.1016/j.ces.2008.09.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Measurements of methane hydrate heat of dissociation using high pressure differential scanning calorimetry

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

6
108
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 171 publications
(114 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
6
108
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Consequently, the dissociation enthalpy of CH 4 -CO 2 mixed hydrate can be reasonably determined by using the Clausius-Clapeyron prediction method, because the PT data measured in this study during thermal dissociation are within a range of low pressure (less than 3.4 MPa). Moreover, it was recently found that the dissociation enthalpy of pure CH 4 hydrate, either predicted by using the Clapeyron equation (e.g., Anderson 19 ) or measured by using a differential scanning calorimeter (e.g., Gupta et al 24 ), remains constant over the three-phase co-existence region. Thus, the calculated results are presumed to be applicable over the conditions investigated here.…”
Section: 24mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Consequently, the dissociation enthalpy of CH 4 -CO 2 mixed hydrate can be reasonably determined by using the Clausius-Clapeyron prediction method, because the PT data measured in this study during thermal dissociation are within a range of low pressure (less than 3.4 MPa). Moreover, it was recently found that the dissociation enthalpy of pure CH 4 hydrate, either predicted by using the Clapeyron equation (e.g., Anderson 19 ) or measured by using a differential scanning calorimeter (e.g., Gupta et al 24 ), remains constant over the three-phase co-existence region. Thus, the calculated results are presumed to be applicable over the conditions investigated here.…”
Section: 24mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(1) was identified with these restrictions: (a) the gas composition and the fractional quantity of the guest molecules occupied in the hydrate cavities should not change appreciably, and (b) the condensed phase volume changes (solid to liquid in this case) should be negligible relative to the gas volume. In particular, Gupta et al 24 argues for limiting the use of the Clausius-Clapeyron equation under high pressure (e.g., higher than 4 MPa). The Clapeyron equation is also known to be limited in that it is difficult to apply to multicomponent gas hydrate systems.…”
Section: Dissociation Enthalpies Of Methane-carbon Dioxide Mixed Hydrmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…5͒ and 54.4Ϯ 1.4 kJ/ mol of gas ͑hydrate→ liquid+ gas͒ at 292 K over a range of pressures up to 20 MPa. 6 Macroscopic models of hydrate decomposition in reservoirs 3,4 often start with an assumption of intrinsic reaction kinetics. The intrinsic reaction kinetics mechanism [7][8][9][10] for methane hydrate decomposition assumes that, at constant temperature, the hydrate decomposition rate, −dn H / dt,i s proportional to the gradient in methane gas fugacity ͑concen-tration or pressure͒ between the solid methane hydrate phase, f hydrate , and the nonequilibrium water-methane mixture at the interface, f interface ,…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The values that we used for the different material properties [11,12] By turning the heater off, the temperature of the heater is maintained at a temperature below a selected maximum temperature (Tmax = 200 °C) in order to avoid temperatures that would vaporize the water produced from the MH dissociation. Thus the only gas produced is the methane.…”
Section: Temperature Distribution In the Mh Depositsmentioning
confidence: 99%