1993
DOI: 10.1006/jfls.1993.1023
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Measurement of the Nonsteady Flow Field in the Opening of a Resonating Cavity Excited by Grazing Flow

Abstract: Flow Flow past past the the opening opening of of a a cavity cavity can can excite excite acoustic acoustic resonance. resonance. TheThe periodic periodic velocity velocity field field in in the the region region of of the the cavity cavity opening opening has has been been measured measured for for various various flow flow conditions conditions and and the the vorticity vorticity distribution distribution has has been been computed computed from from the the measured measured data data using using numerical … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
7
0

Year Published

1998
1998
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
(1 reference statement)
1
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Rockwell & Knisely (1979) and Graf & Durgin (1990) made use of the natural instabilities inherent in a free shear layer to investigate vortex impingement upon a corner. Ziada & Rockwell (1982) Kaykayoglu & Rockwell (1985) and Sohn & Rockwell (1987) have also employed mixing layers in the examination of vortex impingement with sharp and elliptical leading edges at zero angle of incidence.…”
Section: Wilder and D P Telionismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Rockwell & Knisely (1979) and Graf & Durgin (1990) made use of the natural instabilities inherent in a free shear layer to investigate vortex impingement upon a corner. Ziada & Rockwell (1982) Kaykayoglu & Rockwell (1985) and Sohn & Rockwell (1987) have also employed mixing layers in the examination of vortex impingement with sharp and elliptical leading edges at zero angle of incidence.…”
Section: Wilder and D P Telionismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A thorough review was given by Rockwell & Naudascher (1978). More recent work involving shallow cavities includes that of Graf & Durgin (1993) and Chatellier et al (2004). Note, however, that the flow-excited Helmholtz resonator is considered to be unique and distinct from similar configurations involving shallow cavities and the like.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One can also notice that the Strouhal number of the resonator resonance frequency f d ͑ϳ660 Hz͒ based on the aperture slot width ͑w =30 mm͒ and a mean flow velocity U of 20 m/s is 0.99 ͑=f d w / U͒, which is much higher than the expected fundamental frequency of the aerodynamic excitation, which has a Strouhal number of 0.25 as discussed in Nelson et al 9 A Strouhal number of 0.25 corresponds to a frequency of 167 Hz at U =20 m/ s for the present resonators. This further suggests that the shear layer rollup as seen in Graf and Durgin 17 was not likely to affect the results of the present study. Figure 5͑a͒ shows the pressure fluctuation spectra at P1 within the range of U tested.…”
Section: Observations and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 52%
“…One can therefore expect complicated aeroacoustical activities occur when the resonator interacts with flow turbulence. In the building services practice, the dimensions of the Helmholtz resonator may not enable the kind of shear layer/ vortex impingements studied in Dequand et al 12 and Graf and Durgin 17 to occur, especially when the mean flow is of very low Mach number and the resonator cavity is small. The theories adopted by Meissner 11 and Innes and Crighton 18 assumed a continuous sinusoidal excitation at the mouth of the resonator by shear layer rollup/vortex shedding while the initiation of the oscillating flow was not explicitly shown in their formulations.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%