2022
DOI: 10.1103/physrevlett.128.023001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Measurement of the 2S1/28D5/2 Transition in Hyd

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

3
33
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 48 publications
(37 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
3
33
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This led to what was dubbed as the proton charge radius puzzle [5], triggering many experimental and theoretical efforts striving for a solution. The most recent determinations of the radius from e-p scattering [6] or from the Lamb shift [7] and the 2S − 4P transition [8] in hydrogen are agreeing with the value from muonic hydrogen, while the most recent measurement of the 2S 1/2 − 8D 5/2 transition in hydrogen is disagreeing by around 3σ [9]. Measurements of the 1S − 3S transition in hydrogen support both the smaller radius [10] as well as the originally accepted value [11].…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 52%
“…This led to what was dubbed as the proton charge radius puzzle [5], triggering many experimental and theoretical efforts striving for a solution. The most recent determinations of the radius from e-p scattering [6] or from the Lamb shift [7] and the 2S − 4P transition [8] in hydrogen are agreeing with the value from muonic hydrogen, while the most recent measurement of the 2S 1/2 − 8D 5/2 transition in hydrogen is disagreeing by around 3σ [9]. Measurements of the 1S − 3S transition in hydrogen support both the smaller radius [10] as well as the originally accepted value [11].…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 52%
“…It is important to point out that the recent new experimental measurement of the 2s 1/2 − 8d 5/2 transition frequency is based on the second type of experiment discussed above. As stated in [29], the QIE is negligible. However, we find that NR is −1174.02 Hz and has an experimental error order of 2 kHz [29].…”
Section: Experiments Based On 2s State Quenchingmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…As stated in [29], the QIE is negligible. However, we find that NR is −1174.02 Hz and has an experimental error order of 2 kHz [29]. A simple analysis of the involvement of NR corrections, listed in Table 5, in determining the proton charge radius and the Rydberg constant can be found in [95].…”
Section: Experiments Based On 2s State Quenchingmentioning
confidence: 92%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The measurement of the 1S − 2S transition has been performed in a magnetic trap of hydrogen [28] and antihydrogen [29] and also in a beam [30]. More recently, experiments measured the 1S − 3S [31] and the 2S 1/2 − 8D 5/2 [32] transitions of hydrogen with unprecedented precision. Furthermore, magnetic slowing of paramagnetic hydrogen has been proposed [33].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%