1996
DOI: 10.1002/(sici)1099-0496(199605)21:5<290::aid-ppul4>3.3.co;2-5
|Get access via publisher |Summarize |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts

Measurement of lung function in awake 2–4‐year‐old asthmatic children during methacholine challenge and acute asthma: A comparison of the impulse oscillation technique, the interrupter technique, and transcutaneous measurement of oxygen versus whole‐body plethysmography

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
21
5
4
1

Citation Types

0
17
0
1

Year Published

1996
1996
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
27
1

Relationship

0
28

Authors

Journals

citations

Cited by 28 publications

(18 citation statements)
references

References 0 publications

0
17
0
1
Order By: Relevance
How this paper cites the one you are viewing
“…10,12,17 However, other studies using bronchial challenge testing have suggested that X5 provides the best discrimination. 9,13 The present study demonstrated that baseline X5 (Pre) was significantly decreased in asthmatic compared with control subjects when predicted values were used. However, baseline R5 (Pre) showed a greater decrease than X5, using the predicted values; this finding implies that baseline lung function in patients with mild asthma is better reflected by R5 rather than X5.…”
Section: Discussion
mentioning
confidence: 49%
“…25 However, many studies have recently used IOS to evaluate non-specific bronchial challenge tests in paediatric patients, because forced expiratory manoeuvres are usually difficult for these patients. 9,[13][14][15]26 Snashall et al 26 showed that IOS measures were more sensitive than FEV1, because positive reactions were observed following the administration of lower concentrations of histamine. Broeders et al 18 conducted a study in which FOT and FEV1 were compared in methacholine challenge tests; FOT showed positive reactions at lower concentrations of methacholine and had fewer complications.…”
Section: Discussion
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
How this paper cites the one you are viewing
“…10,12,17 However, other studies using bronchial challenge testing have suggested that X5 provides the best discrimination. 9,13 The present study demonstrated that baseline X5 (Pre) was significantly decreased in asthmatic compared with control subjects when predicted values were used. However, baseline R5 (Pre) showed a greater decrease than X5, using the predicted values; this finding implies that baseline lung function in patients with mild asthma is better reflected by R5 rather than X5.…”
Section: Discussion
mentioning
confidence: 49%
“…25 However, many studies have recently used IOS to evaluate non-specific bronchial challenge tests in paediatric patients, because forced expiratory manoeuvres are usually difficult for these patients. 9,[13][14][15]26 Snashall et al 26 showed that IOS measures were more sensitive than FEV1, because positive reactions were observed following the administration of lower concentrations of histamine. Broeders et al 18 conducted a study in which FOT and FEV1 were compared in methacholine challenge tests; FOT showed positive reactions at lower concentrations of methacholine and had fewer complications.…”
Section: Discussion
mentioning
confidence: 99%
How this paper cites the one you are viewing
“…However, success rates for IOS and spirometry were similar in our study in contrast to other studies where children as young as 2 years were able to perform IOS. 10,24 This may be because in our study, spirometry and IOS were performed only once a year and with no further attempts at training the children between visits. Our findings suggest that both IOS and spirometry can be used in a complementary fashion in a clinical setting since 80% of children were able to successfully perform either IOS or spirometry by age 5 years, and the ability to complete one test was not associated with the ability to complete the other.…”
Section: Discussion
mentioning
confidence: 98%
How this paper cites the one you are viewing
“…28 IOS has been demonstrated that it is not complicated to assess small airway function in asthmatic patients. 29 Some parameters of IOS are available. The respiratory resistance at 5 Hz (R5) and 20 Hz (R20) are thought to be on behalf of the total and central airway resistance, respectively, and the difference between them (R5-R20) is considered to represent peripheral airway resistance.…”
Section: Discussion
mentioning
confidence: 99%