2006
DOI: 10.1016/j.jenvrad.2004.07.008
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Measurement of contaminant removal from skin using a portable fluorescence scanning system

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
1

Year Published

2008
2008
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
10
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Previous findings indicate that increasing surface texture roughness results in lower amounts of particle resuspension, for example, Wu et al (1992), Braun et al (2002), Hession et al (2006) and Andersson et al (2004), and this appears to contradict the findings in the present work. However, the apparent discrepancy can be explained by considering the relative significance of macroscopic and microscopic features of the fabric.…”
Section: Resuspension With Varied Contaminated Clothing Materials Typecontrasting
confidence: 90%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Previous findings indicate that increasing surface texture roughness results in lower amounts of particle resuspension, for example, Wu et al (1992), Braun et al (2002), Hession et al (2006) and Andersson et al (2004), and this appears to contradict the findings in the present work. However, the apparent discrepancy can be explained by considering the relative significance of macroscopic and microscopic features of the fabric.…”
Section: Resuspension With Varied Contaminated Clothing Materials Typecontrasting
confidence: 90%
“…The removal of particles from human skin has been investigated; Hession et al (2006) studied the effect of human body hair on particle fall-off and concluded that hairy skin retained particles for longer periods. To supplement the existing knowledge base, the aim of the present study is to quantify the level of resuspension of hazardous particles directly from clothing surfaces worn by a physically active human, who is engaging in various levels of typical daily physical activity.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The natural removal rate of sub-micron particles from human skin was reported to be 14.7 h [10]. In the analyses, we used 15 h for particulate radionuclides as well as for elemental radioiodine.…”
Section: Natural Removal Ratementioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, it is still in a developmental stage and has several sources of uncertainty. First, the natural removal rate (half-life time) was chosen as 15 hours based on one report [10]. However, it is not certain whether radioactive particles or elemental iodine behave like submicron silica particles.…”
Section: Icrs-13 and Rpsd-2016mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It should be noted that both deposition velocities and clearance half-lives are strongly dependent on particle size. For instance, without forced removal (i.e., thorough washing and scrubbing), particles in the 10 mm range typically have a clearance half-life on human skin of some 3 h, whereas the slightly submicroneous condensation particles that could also be produced by a 'dirty bomb' would tend to lodge in such cavities as hair follicles, where they may remain until the shedding of the stratum corneum after a few weeks (Hession et al, 2006). Even particles as large as several microns are not easily removed from the skin surface by force (Andersson et al, 2004).…”
Section: External and Internal Dose From Contamination Deposited On Hmentioning
confidence: 99%