Meaningful Engagement: Computer-Based Interactive Media Art in Public Space

Her, Jiun-Jhy; Hamlyn, Jim

doi:10.1007/978-3-642-11577-6_3

Cited by 7 publications

(4 citation statements)

References 6 publications

(7 reference statements)

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…During this final selection round, consensus (i.e., a total score of 6, or 2 from each researcher) was needed for the articles to be included in data extraction. Ultimately, 13 articles were included (Bialoskorski et al, 2010;Costello et al, 2005;Deray and Simoff, 2012;Gurion and Jacoby, 2013;Her and Hamlyn, 2010;Hespanhol and Tomitsch, 2014;Hohl, 2009;Jacucci et al, 2009;Morgan and Gunes, 2013;Morrison et al, 2011bMorrison et al, , 2008Morrison et al, , 2011aMuller, 2008).…”

Section: Selection Processmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Source: Griffiths (2009) Because of their fun nature and the attractiveness of participating in/interacting with them, interactive (art) installations are not only used to create aesthetic experiences in museums but are also now appearing in various other places to evoke specific responses between the participant and the artwork (human-to-artwork interaction) or responses between participants (human-to-human interactions). As Her and Hamlyn (2010) noted: "Some of [these works] have even been placed as permanent installations with specific artistic intentions that relate to various public contexts". Examples of intentional interactive installations are branch out (Burke et al, 2012) [ Figure 4(a)], which triggers dialogue between strangers, BrightHearts (SensoriumHealth, 2014) [Figure 4(b)] which relieves pain and enhances relaxation, and moodwall (Klink and Urban Alliance, 2009) [Figure 4(c)] which tries to change one's perception of a neighbourhood.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Participant responses to physical, open-ended interactive digital artworks: a systematic review

Luyten¹,

Braun²,

Witte³

2017

IJART

View full text Add to dashboard Buy / Rent full text

Abstract:The main aim of this systematic review was to describe responses of participants to physical, open-ended interactive digital artworks. Although human-to-artwork and human-to-human responses were found in the 22 identified artworks, more human-to-artwork responses were reported. Both types of responses were further categorised into physical, verbal, and cognitive/emotional responses. The artworks varied from small table-top installations to large, dark open spaces, and had a range of interactive components and features from a heart rate interface to complete body movements. Results imply there is no straightforward relationship between the features of the artwork and the kind of response. However, two factors seemed to influence the participants' responses: the content (concrete or abstract) of the artwork, and the presence of others. Creating interactive artworks that challenge new audiences and/or evoke specific responses requires more knowledge about the dynamics of the interaction between people and interactive artworks. Participant responses to physical, open-ended interactive digital artworks 95

show abstract

Section: Selection Processmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Participant responses to physical, open-ended interactive digital artworks: a systematic review

Luyten¹,

Braun²,

Witte³

2017

IJART

View full text Add to dashboard Buy / Rent full text

show abstract

“…The art of feeling connected Phase 4: Synthesis popularity of interactive art installations, only a few have been formally studied. Thirteen articles were identified that discussed the participant responses to 22 artworks (Bialoskorski, Westerink, & Broek, 2010;Costello, Muller, Amitani, & Edmonds, 2005;Deray & Simoff, 2012;Gurion & Jacoby, 2013;Her & Hamlyn, 2010;Hespanhol & Tomitsch, 2014;Hohl, 2009;Jacucci et al, 2009;Morgan & Gunes, 2013;A. Morrison, Viller, & Mitchell, 2011a, 2011b; A. J.…”

Section: Chaptermentioning

confidence: 99%

“…As Her and Hamlyn (2010) noted: "Some of [these works] have even been placed as permanent installations with specific artistic intentions that relate to various public contexts".…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

The art of feeling connected

Luyten¹

View full text Add to dashboard Buy / Rent full text

People interested in the research are advised to contact the author for the final version of the publication, or visit the DOI to the publisher's website. • The final author version and the galley proof are versions of the publication after peer review. • The final published version features the final layout of the paper including the volume, issue and page numbers. Link to publication General rights Copyright and moral rights for the publications made accessible in the public portal are retained by the authors and/or other copyright owners and it is a condition of accessing publications that users recognise and abide by the legal requirements associated with these rights. • Users may download and print one copy of any publication from the public portal for the purpose of private study or research. • You may not further distribute the material or use it for any profit-making activity or commercial gain • You may freely distribute the URL identifying the publication in the public portal. If the publication is distributed under the terms of Article 25fa of the Dutch Copyright Act, indicated by the "Taverne" license above, please follow below link for the End User Agreement:

show abstract

Meaningful Engagement: Computer-Based Interactive Media Art in Public Space

Cited by 7 publications

References 6 publications

Participant responses to physical, open-ended interactive digital artworks: a systematic review

Participant responses to physical, open-ended interactive digital artworks: a systematic review

The art of feeling connected

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About