2006
DOI: 10.1519/00126548-200606000-00008
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Maximum Strength and Strength Training---A Relationship to Endurance?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
24
0
3

Year Published

2008
2008
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
24
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Because a constant load is used by each player, the test is a measure of absolute muscular endurance (25). Absolute load endurance tests typically result in a greater numbers of repetitions being produced by larger or stronger individuals (12,25; Table 1), which could suggest the test is more an evaluation of muscle endurance than an assessment of strength.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Because a constant load is used by each player, the test is a measure of absolute muscular endurance (25). Absolute load endurance tests typically result in a greater numbers of repetitions being produced by larger or stronger individuals (12,25; Table 1), which could suggest the test is more an evaluation of muscle endurance than an assessment of strength.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…24 Increasing strength may also allow a runner to maintain mechanics for longer during intense running. 25 A variety of strength training programs using heavy loads and lighter loads in explosive strength training have been shown to improve running performance in middle distances and laboratory runs within our target timeframes with subjects from a variety of populations.…”
Section: Strengthmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, evidence indicates that strength training can improve run performance. 24,29 Therefore, chronic strength training may provide further performance benefits for runners.…”
Section: Strengthmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…For optimal results, training programs generally follow a periodized method (Bartonietz, 1987;Bielik, 1984;Bompa, 1994;Fry, 1992;Stone, 2006;Stone, 2002). Periodization can be further explained as the division of the training year to meet specific objectives to produce high levels of performance at designated times and consist of periodic changes of training objectives as well as task workload and content (Gambetta, 1991;Haff, 2004;Schmidt, 2000).…”
Section: Program Designmentioning
confidence: 99%