2019
DOI: 10.1513/annalsats.201808-506oc
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Maximal Static Respiratory and Sniff Pressures in Healthy Children. A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

2
39
3
6

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 34 publications
(50 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
2
39
3
6
Order By: Relevance
“…Sniff nasal inspiratory pressure in the 7 patients completing this study was 73.6 + 11.1 cm H 2 O (4 of the patients were not able to complete the study because of lack of equipment access to measure the maximal inspiratory pressures and SNIPs). With these limitations and using proposed new normative values in children for maximal inspiratory pressure and sniff nasal inspiratory pressure, 19 we found that 6/11 patients had low maximal inspiratory pressure and 2/7 patients experienced abnormally low sniff nasal inspiratory pressure. There were no differences in myasthenia gravis extent or severity, onset of symptoms, presence of thymectomy, or steroid use in patients with abnormal respiratory tests compared to those without respiratory abnormality.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…Sniff nasal inspiratory pressure in the 7 patients completing this study was 73.6 + 11.1 cm H 2 O (4 of the patients were not able to complete the study because of lack of equipment access to measure the maximal inspiratory pressures and SNIPs). With these limitations and using proposed new normative values in children for maximal inspiratory pressure and sniff nasal inspiratory pressure, 19 we found that 6/11 patients had low maximal inspiratory pressure and 2/7 patients experienced abnormally low sniff nasal inspiratory pressure. There were no differences in myasthenia gravis extent or severity, onset of symptoms, presence of thymectomy, or steroid use in patients with abnormal respiratory tests compared to those without respiratory abnormality.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…Categories were defined by the study physiotherapist (Grade 0: no contracture/hyperflexibility to Grade 4: most severe contracture). Reference values for pulmonary function testing were included for forced vital capacity (FVC) 25 , maximal inspiratory pressure (MIP) 26 , and peak cough flow (PCF) 27 . Participants were excluded from FVC% Predicted calculation if height and weight were not captured, or if they were unable to perform the assessment.…”
Section: Study Measuresmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Maximal static inspiratory and expiratory pressures (PImax and PEmax, respectively), and sniff nasal inspiratory pressure (SNIP) are parameters commonly used to assess respiratory muscle strength in both adult and pediatric populations 1 . Although PImax is classically measured to assess global inspiratory muscle strength, this maneuver can be di cult, especially for children due to their reduced ability to understand and coordinate the effort with a hermetic seal placed around the mouthpiece 2 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%