“…, Nicholas CARLSON 2 , Ulla B. MOGENSEN3 , Christina ELLERVIK4 and Gregor B. E. JEMEC1 The age-, sex-and smoke-adjusted analysis revealed a mean eGFR of 94.63 ml/min/1.73 m 2 (95% CI 89.99-99.27) for the hospital HS group, 88.00 ml/min/1.73 m 2 (95% CI 86.72-89.29) for the population HS group, and 88.41 ml/min/1.73 m 2 (95% CI 88.10-88.71) for the population non-HS group. Thus, yielding a statistically significant age-, sex-and smoke-adjusted MD of 6.= 0.7866) for the population HS group vs. the non-HS group(Tables SII and SIII 1 ).The age-, sex-, smoke-, BMI-, hypertension-and diabetes-adjusted analysis revealed a mean eGFR of 95.53 ml/min/1.73 m 2 (95% CI 90.66-100.40) for the hospital HS group, 90.25 ml/min/1.73 m 2 (95% CI 88.55-91.96) for the population HS group, and 88.72 ml/min/1.73 m 2 (95% CI 88.10-89.34) for the population non-HS group.…”