2022
DOI: 10.1111/nyas.14773
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Mathematics anxiety in deaf, hard of hearing, and hearing college students

Abstract: While mathematics anxiety (MA) has been widely researched in recent decades, this study addresses significant gaps: namely, research that explores the relationship between MA and self‐reported mathematics experiences; samples adults with a range of MA levels; and controls for general anxiety. Additionally, the study sampled deaf and hard of hearing (DHH) students, whose diverse life and educational experiences often differ from hearing students’. We investigated whether DHH students’ experiences with mathemati… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 89 publications
(212 reference statements)
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Although no past studies have investigated or established a twoway interactive effect between the treatment plan (RT and REBT) vis-à-vis onset of deafness (prelingual and postlingual) but past studies such as Adigun ( 2022 2019) have established that language deprivation among deaf learners have been a major factor responsible for lower academic outcomes among deaf learners. Regardless of onset of deafness, deaf learners are at a disadvantage in situations where oral communication without support of visual reinforcement is allowed (Adigun, 2022;Hyde et al, 2003;Mishra et al, 2022;Sugaya et al, 2019). In other words, even if there will be an observable significant interaction effect between the treatments and onset of deafness on MA among the participants of this study, such intervention programme must scale up by actively supplementing the treatment with visual reinforcement.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…Although no past studies have investigated or established a twoway interactive effect between the treatment plan (RT and REBT) vis-à-vis onset of deafness (prelingual and postlingual) but past studies such as Adigun ( 2022 2019) have established that language deprivation among deaf learners have been a major factor responsible for lower academic outcomes among deaf learners. Regardless of onset of deafness, deaf learners are at a disadvantage in situations where oral communication without support of visual reinforcement is allowed (Adigun, 2022;Hyde et al, 2003;Mishra et al, 2022;Sugaya et al, 2019). In other words, even if there will be an observable significant interaction effect between the treatments and onset of deafness on MA among the participants of this study, such intervention programme must scale up by actively supplementing the treatment with visual reinforcement.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Although no past studies have investigated or established a two‐way interactive effect between the treatment plan (RT and REBT) vis‐à‐vis onset of deafness (prelingual and postlingual) but past studies such as Adigun (2022), Adigun and Ajayi (2015), Adigun and Iheme (2020), Leton & Dosinaeng, 2019, Marschark et al (2009), Mishra et al (2022), Nikolaraizi et al (2013), Olaoluwa and Ayantoye (2016), Suess et al (2022) and Sugaya et al (2019) have established that language deprivation among deaf learners have been a major factor responsible for lower academic outcomes among deaf learners. Regardless of onset of deafness, deaf learners are at a disadvantage in situations where oral communication without support of visual reinforcement is allowed (Adigun, 2022; Hyde et al, 2003; Mishra et al, 2022; Sugaya et al, 2019). In other words, even if there will be an observable significant interaction effect between the treatments and onset of deafness on MA among the participants of this study, such intervention programme must scale up by actively supplementing the treatment with visual reinforcement.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations