2004
DOI: 10.1016/j.wear.2004.01.011
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Material removal model for chemical–mechanical polishing considering wafer flexibility and edge effects

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0
1

Year Published

2007
2007
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
0
6
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The spatial distribution correlates with the WIWNU observed in a single wafer, whereas the long-range temporal distribution correlates with the MRR decay and the resulting WTWNU over a batch of wafers. Seok et al [57] showed large changes in polishing removal rate near the wafer's edges (edge effects), as often seen in practice, with very uniform removal across most of the wafer surface. Kim et al [58] in a three-dimensional multiscale elastohydrodynamic lubrication (EHL) contact model showed that the contact force exerted on the wafer surface by asperities is nonuniform across the wafer, which implies nonuniformity in material removal.…”
Section: Review Of Modeling Of Pad Effects On Polishing Performancementioning
confidence: 92%
“…The spatial distribution correlates with the WIWNU observed in a single wafer, whereas the long-range temporal distribution correlates with the MRR decay and the resulting WTWNU over a batch of wafers. Seok et al [57] showed large changes in polishing removal rate near the wafer's edges (edge effects), as often seen in practice, with very uniform removal across most of the wafer surface. Kim et al [58] in a three-dimensional multiscale elastohydrodynamic lubrication (EHL) contact model showed that the contact force exerted on the wafer surface by asperities is nonuniform across the wafer, which implies nonuniformity in material removal.…”
Section: Review Of Modeling Of Pad Effects On Polishing Performancementioning
confidence: 92%
“…研磨减薄的优势是减薄速率可以超过 300 µm/min, 适合 大批量生产 [87] ; 劣势是单纯的研磨减薄无法对薄膜厚度进行精确控制, 同时研磨过程中会引入应力, 当薄膜厚度小于 200 µm 时容易发生破碎. 除此之外, 借助化学机械抛光 [88] 以及纯化学腐蚀的方法也 可去除背面衬底 [89,90] , 化学腐蚀减薄衬底的方法可以避免应力的引入, 缺点是速率较低. 因此, 一个 理想的方法是首先通过机械研磨的手段将加工好器件的衬底减薄到 200 µm 左右, 随后借助化学手段 将衬底刻蚀到所需厚度.…”
Section: 干法转移工艺可将单晶硅锗薄膜微米、纳米量级的微结构、图案高效转移到不同的柔性衬底上面 图 2(b)unclassified
“…This includes mechanical grinding [22,23] and chemical mechanical polishing. [23][24][25] Wafer thinning realized via the chemical etching through a wet chemical etching agent [26] or dry gas plasma chemical reactions with Si material. [27] However, a significant part of the original material is lost during the thinning process.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%