1990
DOI: 10.1016/0022-3115(90)90377-y
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Material property correlations for uranium mononitride

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

3
33
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
3
2
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 105 publications
(42 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
3
33
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Holt and Almassy then compared this to the work of Sturiale and DeCrescente, who estimated an apparent activation energy for grain boundary diffusion of 121 kJ / mol . The works of Sturiale and DeCrescente [167], Holt and Almassy [165], and Droege and Alexander [168] were compared by Hayes [169] in 1990 ( Figure 124). However, the reports by Sturiale and DeCrescente and Droege and Alexander were not available for my review.…”
Section: Appendix E: Discussion and Review Of Nitrogen Diffusion In Umentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Holt and Almassy then compared this to the work of Sturiale and DeCrescente, who estimated an apparent activation energy for grain boundary diffusion of 121 kJ / mol . The works of Sturiale and DeCrescente [167], Holt and Almassy [165], and Droege and Alexander [168] were compared by Hayes [169] in 1990 ( Figure 124). However, the reports by Sturiale and DeCrescente and Droege and Alexander were not available for my review.…”
Section: Appendix E: Discussion and Review Of Nitrogen Diffusion In Umentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the reports by Sturiale and DeCrescente and Droege and Alexander were not available for my review. The data presented in this review is merely data presented by Holt and Almassy [165] and Hayes [169]. [169] of three independent studies on the selfdiffusion coefficient of nitrogen in the UN system.…”
Section: Appendix E: Discussion and Review Of Nitrogen Diffusion In Umentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…UN is one possible accident tolerant fuel, mostly due to its high thermal conductivity (15,8 W/m.K at 1000 K), which moreover rises with temperature [5,6] , unlike UO 2 . The higher thermal conductivity enables operation at lower temperatures [4] , which guarantees less heat is retained in the fuel elements.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 94%