Proceedings International Conference on Shape Modeling and Applications
DOI: 10.1109/sma.2001.923386
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Matching 3D models with shape distributions

Abstract: Measuring the similarity between 3D shapes is a fundamental problem, with applications in computer vision

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
329
0
2

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 419 publications
(331 citation statements)
references
References 48 publications
0
329
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…They show, that in most cases this is the better alternative than a normalizing approach. In [8] Reisert et al enhanced the Shape Distribution introduced by Osada [6] by SH-expansion. The currently best performing methods on the PSB are the so-called Light Field Descriptors (LFD) [2].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They show, that in most cases this is the better alternative than a normalizing approach. In [8] Reisert et al enhanced the Shape Distribution introduced by Osada [6] by SH-expansion. The currently best performing methods on the PSB are the so-called Light Field Descriptors (LFD) [2].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since the entire shape is used for retrieval, normalization techniques can be used to remove much of the transformational ambiguity in matching, allowing for the use of the center of mass for removing translational ambiguity, radial-variance or mean-/bounding-radius for removing scaling ambiguity, and principal axes for rotational ambiguity. These methods have included: 1D histograms capturing the distribution of points [2,3,4], crease angles [5], and curvature [6] over the surface; spherical functions characterizing the distribution of surface normals [7], axes of reflective symmetry [8], conformality [9], and angular extent [10]; 3D functions characterizing the rasterization of the boundary boundary points [11] and the distance transform [12]; and even 4D plenoptic functions characterizing the 2D views of a surface [13].…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The shape distributions proposed by Osada et al [22,23] is a shape descriptor where several shape characteristics can be measured for a random set of points belonging to the model, according to the selection of an appropriate shape function. There are variations of this method according to the characteristic that is measured, e.g.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Another approach to normalize a 3D model for rotation (similar to PCA), is the use of singular value decomposition (SVD) [28]. In [22,30], the SVD of the covariance matrix of the 3D model is computed and the unitary matrix is applied to the model for rotation normalization.…”
Section: Translation and Rotation Normalizationmentioning
confidence: 99%