1997
DOI: 10.1006/mssp.1996.0066
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Matched Field Acoustics

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

2002
2002
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…5 for the event indicated in Figs 2 and 3 by the yellow star and vertical red line, respectively. The array-based location is done with a modified version of the matched-field processing (MFP) algorithm of Kuperman & Turek (1997) and Cros et al (2011), and projecting phase delays of the MFP onto a 3-D grid with the linear Bartlett operator. Additional details on this location technique are given in the supplementary material.…”
Section: R E S U Lt Smentioning
confidence: 99%
“…5 for the event indicated in Figs 2 and 3 by the yellow star and vertical red line, respectively. The array-based location is done with a modified version of the matched-field processing (MFP) algorithm of Kuperman & Turek (1997) and Cros et al (2011), and projecting phase delays of the MFP onto a 3-D grid with the linear Bartlett operator. Additional details on this location technique are given in the supplementary material.…”
Section: R E S U Lt Smentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Sage Brush Flat (SGB) site on the San Jacinto Fault Zone (SJFZ) southeast of Anza, California is the location of a previous dense geophone deployment (Ben‐Zion et al, ) and various studies associated with detailed imaging of the subsurface material (Hillers et al, ; Mordret et al, ; Roux et al, ) and detection of small earthquakes and air‐traffic events (Meng & Ben‐Zion, , ). Using a frequency‐domain matched‐field processing technique involving beamforming and backprojection of continuous array data (Corciulo et al, ; Kuperman & Turek, ), very small events were detected at the SGB site and were found to cluster near structures, fences, and within the vegetation. The locations suggest that these events are associated with shallow ground motion generated at the foundations of these objects by wind gusts (Gradon et al, ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Previous studies that have attempted to spatially track water flow have documented their azimuthal distribution but not their epicentral coordinates (24)(25)(26). Location of epicentral coordinates of simultaneously active and spatially spread noise sources indeed represents a major seismological challenge (27), since it requires observations of the wave-field all around the targeted sources with high enough resolution to deal with its strong incoherency (28,29). Here, we demonstrate that well-resolved maps of subglacial drainage systems can be retrieved using particularly dense seismic arrays and by adapting the matched-field processing (MFP) technique (28) to the particularity of dealing with spatially spread sources.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%