1975
Mastoid Obliteration: Histopathological Study of Three Temporal Bones
Search citation statements
Paper Sections
Select...
12
4
3
1
Citation Types
0
11
0
0
Year Published
1976
2019
Publication Types
Select...
17
Relationship
0
17
Authors
Journals
Cited by 17 publications
(11 citation statements)
References 3 publications
0
11
0
0
“…Some clinicians have a preference for autogenous materials because of lower costs, convenience, and excellent biocompatibility. [10][11][12] However, some of these materials provide less structural support and can have inappropriate degradation periods. 13 Ojala et al 14 reported that musculoperiosteal flaps eventually shrank when used as the filler material.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some clinicians have a preference for autogenous materials because of lower costs, convenience, and excellent biocompatibility. [10][11][12] However, some of these materials provide less structural support and can have inappropriate degradation periods. 13 Ojala et al 14 reported that musculoperiosteal flaps eventually shrank when used as the filler material.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Derald et al 9 reported failed cases with the use of β‐tricalcium phosphate in mastoid obliteration because of the lack of biocompatibility. Some clinicians have a preference for autogenous materials because of lower costs, convenience, and excellent biocompatibility 10‐12 . However, some of these materials provide less structural support and can have inappropriate degradation periods 13 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Ear surgeons usually use local flaps, autologous cartilage, or some fatty tissues to fill the mastoid cavities [1][2][3][4][5]. However, in many cases it is difficult to obtain sufficient tissue to obliterate large cavities and sometimes these tissues can atrophy and involute as time goes on [3,16].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, in many cases it is difficult to obtain sufficient tissue to obliterate large cavities and sometimes these tissues can atrophy and involute as time goes on [3,16]. As a result, synthetic bioactive materials are used to reconstruct mastoid defect.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…2 However, in spite of better hearing results for this procedure, recurrence rates seemed to be higher than for canal wall down tympanoplasty, and more than one surgical procedure was often needed. 3,4 Therefore, the ideal procedure for middle-ear cholesteatoma should be a canal wall down tympanoplasty 9 -11 with special attention paid to optimising hearing results. Although this procedure is currently widely performed, few papers report actual hearing results.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
