1997
DOI: 10.1179/026708397790285304
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Mass transfer and morphological changes in AISI 316 stainless steel in high temperature flowing sodium

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

1
9
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

2
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
1
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…3(c) and (d)). This layer was similar to the one observed in sodium exposed 316 stainless steel [19]. However, the depth of degraded layer in type 316 stainless steel was around 15 lm.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 76%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…3(c) and (d)). This layer was similar to the one observed in sodium exposed 316 stainless steel [19]. However, the depth of degraded layer in type 316 stainless steel was around 15 lm.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 76%
“…Table 3 gives the surface carburization values as a function of distance for type 316 LN stainless steel exposed to sodium. In type 316 stainless steel, carbon concentration had attained a maximum of 0.135 wt% at a depth of 43 lm [14] and equaled the bulk concentration at a distance of 74 lm from the surface. In type 316LN stainless steel, the peak concentration of carbon was attained at 10 lm, immediately after the end of the degraded layer, while the bulk concentration was attained at a distance of 38 lm.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 97%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…[29] This value was a hundred times higher than the value of carbon activity reported (~0.001) in Fe-18Cr-8Ni austenitic stainless steel containing 0.04 pct carbon. [30] Hence, in Indian sodium containing 25 ppm carbon, of which 2 ppm is in solution, carbon activity would be much higher than in type 316LN austenitic stainless steel containing 0.03 wt pct carbon. [31] A comparison of Figures 5(b) and (c) suggested that the carbon diffusing into type 316LN stainless steel caused extensive precipitation of M 23 C 6 carbides.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%