1978
DOI: 10.1086/155767
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Mass loss from dynamically unstable stellar envelopes

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
27
0

Year Published

1980
1980
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
5
5

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 53 publications
(29 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
2
27
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Glatzel & Kiriakidis (1998) have recently contended that the nonadiabatic radial oscillation eigenfrequency should be used to test for dynamical instability. However, as shown by the one-zone model (Stothers & Chin 1997) as well as by numerical calculations of distributed stellar models (Tuchman, Sack, & Barkat 1978 ;Stothers 1999), the nonadiabatic contribution shows up only as pulsational instability, in the form of periodic oscillations superimposed on the quasi-adiabatic, dynamical expansion of the outer envelope. Dynamical instability itself is an adiabatic phenomenon, not related to the pulsational instability.…”
Section: Criterion For Dynamical Instabilitymentioning
confidence: 95%
“…Glatzel & Kiriakidis (1998) have recently contended that the nonadiabatic radial oscillation eigenfrequency should be used to test for dynamical instability. However, as shown by the one-zone model (Stothers & Chin 1997) as well as by numerical calculations of distributed stellar models (Tuchman, Sack, & Barkat 1978 ;Stothers 1999), the nonadiabatic contribution shows up only as pulsational instability, in the form of periodic oscillations superimposed on the quasi-adiabatic, dynamical expansion of the outer envelope. Dynamical instability itself is an adiabatic phenomenon, not related to the pulsational instability.…”
Section: Criterion For Dynamical Instabilitymentioning
confidence: 95%
“…The specific instability which causes AGB envelope ejection is still debated, but numerous previous studies exist (see, e.g., Paczyński & Ziółkowski 1968;Kutter & Sparks 1974;Tuchman et al 1978Tuchman et al , 1979Fox & Wood 1982;Wagenhuber & Weiss 1994;Han et al 1994;Soker 2008).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is clear that this is only a rough estimate; nevertheless a comparison with models of convective envelopes calculated for the same conditions with the mixing length theory using the method described by Tuchman et al (1978) give an agreement better than a factor of 3.…”
Section: The Convective Timescalementioning
confidence: 88%