2020
DOI: 10.7189/jogh.10.020439
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Masculinities and violence: using latent class analysis to investigate the origins and correlates of differences between men in the cross-sectional UN Multi-country Study on men and violence in Asia and the Pacific

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
9
0
1

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
0
9
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…It was anticipated that partner characteristics would be key drivers of the SIPV risk of SWs and partner controlling behaviour a key indicator. Previous research among men who have been clients of SWs confirms that they have notably violent and controlling behaviour ( Jewkes et al., 2012a , 2012b ), as well as being clients of SWs, being associated with a propensity for physical violence and rape peretration ( Jewkes & Morrell, 2017 ; Jewkes, Jordaan, Myrttinen, & Gibbs, 2020 ). This points for the need for interventions with men to protect FSWs and other women from violence.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…It was anticipated that partner characteristics would be key drivers of the SIPV risk of SWs and partner controlling behaviour a key indicator. Previous research among men who have been clients of SWs confirms that they have notably violent and controlling behaviour ( Jewkes et al., 2012a , 2012b ), as well as being clients of SWs, being associated with a propensity for physical violence and rape peretration ( Jewkes & Morrell, 2017 ; Jewkes, Jordaan, Myrttinen, & Gibbs, 2020 ). This points for the need for interventions with men to protect FSWs and other women from violence.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Working through women’s trauma is not only an optional add-on to IPV prevention interventions, but an integral resource for reducing women’s risk of IPV. Attention to men’s trauma is also important for IPV reduction interventions, particularly given the evidence that the men who commit non-partner rape are often the same as those who perpetuate IPV, and that this is often associated with their own experiences of child abuse and neglect 59. However, it is important to remember that attention to poor mental health as an IPV prevention strategy also needs to be considered alongside the urgent need for structural interventions that address the contexts of violence and poverty as a key driver of a multiple intersecting forms of violence in this context.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Women's endorsement of attitudes tolerant of IPV is the result of socialization within home environments that support men's right to use IPV as a form of discipline [38]. This use of IPV by men against their spouses is not only an enormous threat to the mental and physical health of women globally, but also an influential factor in the future attitudes and behaviors of children who witness it [55,56]. Children who observe violence against their mothers or are victims of it themselves internalize the lesson that violence is an acceptable conflict resolution tool and may go on to model these behaviors later in life [57].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%