Marketing Love and Sex

Hatfield, Elaine; Forbes, Megan; Rapson, Richard L.

doi:10.1007/s12115-012-9593-1

Cited by 15 publications

(10 citation statements)

References 7 publications

(7 reference statements)

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…: 13). Research on the validity of online nonsexual dating sites finds a great deal of 'deception' with facts (Toma, Hancock and Ellison 2008;Hatfield, Forbes and Rapson 2011). For example, men tend to exaggerate their height, income and occupation, whereas women misrepresent their age, level of physical attraction and whether they have children.…”

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…To this end, we want to explore the sex differences in men's and women's willingness to seek out casual sexual liaisons. The incidence of casual sex promoted amongst straights appears to be a prominent feature in modern society (Grello, Welsh and Harper 2006;Hatfield, Forbes and Rapson 2011;Lambert, Kahn and Apple 2003;Paul, McManus and Hayes 2000) and has a number of colloquial terms, including 'hooking up' and 'no strings attached' sex. If 'hooking up' (i.e.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Focality and Extension in Kinship: Essays in Memory of Harold W. Scheffler

Shapiro¹

2018

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Hal Scheffler was one of the world's great anthropologists and, without question, its foremost authority on human kinship. These considerations in themselves would be quite enough to merit a collection of essays in his memory, but his work also touches upon certain larger issues in our appreciation of the human condition, as well as current social controversies.It was for his extensionist position on kinship terminologies-what he liked to call 'systems of kin classification'-that he was best known. In a nutshell, Scheffler would come to raise two questions: (1) What is the primary meaning-what he called the focus-of kinship terms like English 'mother', 'father', 'brother', 'sister' etc.? (2) By what procedures do people extend these meanings from their foci to others? His answers, based upon meticulous analyses of kinship terminologies in various parts of the world, were that focal membership is supplied mostly by nuclear family relationships, from which relationships it is extended to peopleeven to things-outside the nuclear family; and that these extensions are accomplished by ordered sets of rules that have considerable generality cross-culturally. Choiseul Island kinshipScheffler's first publication on kinship, based upon his doctoral dissertation, was his book-length treatment of sociality on Choiseul Island (Scheffler 1965), now part of the independent Solomon Islands. Two things deserve special emphasis in Scheffler's Choiseul analysis. First, there are rich data on distinctions made by the Choiseulese themselves. Second, Choiseulese ideas about kinship are not so different from our own. 1 We are especially indebted for this personal information from Jan Simpson, Hal's widow, her secretary Mary Smith and Ray Kelly, his Yale colleague. 5 INTRODUCTIONWith regard to the first point, even though more distant kin are superficially classed with one's parents, siblings, children, and other close kin, these latter are said, in native parlance, to be the 'true' members of their respective kin classes (Scheffler 1965: 75, 81). The singling out of focal membership by words translatable as 'true' (or 'real') is typical of a very large number of kinship terminologies throughout the world-a point Hal Scheffler would repeatedly make in subsequent analyses (e.g. Scheffler 1972b: 354; Scheffler 1973: 766; Scheffler and Lounsbury 1971: 43) and which probably supplies the most frequently encountered evidence in the ethnographic literature for the extensionist position (Shapiro 2016(Shapiro , 2017. With regard to the second point, Scheffler notes an expression in the Choiseul language that he translates as 'kin', which implies that they idiomise kinship in ways that are entirely familiar to English speakers. Towards a general theory of human kinshipA year after the publication of his Choiseul analysis, Hal Scheffler put forward nothing less than a general statement on human kinship. In this important but neglected essay Scheffler lays the groundwork for his general position on human kinship, to wit: [D]ifferent socie...

show abstract

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Focality and Extension in Kinship: Essays in Memory of Harold W. Scheffler

Shapiro¹

2018

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…1 Further details of the breakdown of our sample size categories can be seen in Table 3. Research on the validity of online nonsexual dating sites finds a great deal of 'deception' with facts (Toma, Hancock and Ellison 2008;Hatfield, Forbes and Rapson 2011). For example, men tend to exaggerate their height, income and occupation, whereas women misrepresent their age, level of physical attraction and whether they have children.…”

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

12. Do Women Really Desire Casual Sex? Analysis of a Popular Adult Online Dating/Liaison Site

Escasa‐Dorne¹,

Jankowiak²

2018

Focality and Extension in Kinship: Essays in Memory of Harold W. Scheffler

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

“…In other words, an individual absorbs emotions expressed by other people with whom they interact (emotional contagion absorbed), but the same individual also "infects" others around with one's own emotions that s/he feels and communicates (emotional contagion infected) through various means [31]. Despite theory [32] and neuroscience evidence [27] showing that people are able to draw others into their emotional orbits and infect them with the emotions they express (i.e., contagion infected), emotional contagion research tends to overlook the impact of emotional contagion infected (i.e., individuals virally spreading their own emotions into others). For example, the empirical investigation on dyadic situations, wherein one individual(s) is a receiver of emotions and another individual(s) is the sender of emotions, usually conceptualizes and measures emotional contagion only from the perspective of the emotions absorbed by others.…”

Section: Emotional Contagion Infected: An Overlooked Perspectivementioning

confidence: 99%

“…Emotional contagion at work is best described as the unintentional tendency of people to exchange emotions with one another (i.e., both absorbed from and infected into others) during social interactions, thereby achieving an emotional convergence that spreads in large organizational communities [26,32]. Hence, emotional contagion epidemically circulates during socialization processes that allow the exchange of emotions among actors.…”

Section: Emotional Contagion Infected Instigated Incivility and Burmentioning

confidence: 99%

Burning out? Watch your own incivility and the emotions you spread

Петитта

Jiang

2019

WOR

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

BACKGROUND: The present study focuses on perpetrators of workplace incivility. OBJECTIVE: We set to answer two questions: 1) why the perpetrator instigates uncivil behaviors in the workplace, and 2) what are the consequences of workplace incivility on the perpetrator him/herself. METHODS: We examined the perpetrator burnout outcome of instigated incivility and infected emotional contagion as predictor of one's uncivil behaviors towards others and tested the crosscountry structural invariance of the hypothesized nomological network on data from the U.S. and Italy. RESULTS: Data from employees in the U.S. (N = 350) and Italy (N = 273) suggest that contagion of joy infected into others and anger infected into others were related to instigated incivility, which, in turn, was positively related to emotional exhaustion and cynicism. Our results were structurally invariant across the two countries. CONCLUSIONS: Similar to the victims of incivility, the perpetrator of workplace incivility also suffers from heightened burnout. As such, an employee experiencing and infecting into other employees his/her own negative/positive emotions increases/decreases his/her own tendency to initiate rude behaviors toward others. Overall, our findings shed light on predictors and consequences of workplace instigated incivility. We hope our research can serve as a springboard to the understanding and prevention of incivility initiated by employees.

show abstract

Marketing Love and Sex

Cited by 15 publications

References 7 publications

Focality and Extension in Kinship: Essays in Memory of Harold W. Scheffler

Focality and Extension in Kinship: Essays in Memory of Harold W. Scheffler

12. Do Women Really Desire Casual Sex? Analysis of a Popular Adult Online Dating/Liaison Site

Burning out? Watch your own incivility and the emotions you spread

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About