2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.cub.2020.02.016
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Marine Sediments Illuminate Chlamydiae Diversity and Evolution

Abstract: Highlights d Abundant, diverse, and active chlamydiae are found in anoxic, deep-marine sediments d Several of the retrieved marine-sediment chlamydial genomes form new clades d These genomes encode features of symbionts, despite a lack of evidence for hosts d Chlamydiaceae did not evolve early and have relatives in marine sediment Authors

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
69
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 59 publications
(75 citation statements)
references
References 166 publications
1
69
0
Order By: Relevance
“…While gene order breaks down for some Alpha- and Epsilon-proteobacterial systems, as noted by Liu & Ochman (2007), it is otherwise conserved across proteobacteria as well as deep splits in the bacterial tree, including Chloroflexi, Spirochetes, Firmicutes, Nitrospirae, Thermotogae, and Verrucomicrobia. The gene order is also found in the presumed “flagellar remnant” (Betts-Hampikian and Fields 2010) system found in Chlamydiae in addition to their classic NF-T3SS; some marine Chlamydiae are now known to have flagella (Collingro et al 2017; Dharamshi et al 2020).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While gene order breaks down for some Alpha- and Epsilon-proteobacterial systems, as noted by Liu & Ochman (2007), it is otherwise conserved across proteobacteria as well as deep splits in the bacterial tree, including Chloroflexi, Spirochetes, Firmicutes, Nitrospirae, Thermotogae, and Verrucomicrobia. The gene order is also found in the presumed “flagellar remnant” (Betts-Hampikian and Fields 2010) system found in Chlamydiae in addition to their classic NF-T3SS; some marine Chlamydiae are now known to have flagella (Collingro et al 2017; Dharamshi et al 2020).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…2c). There are currently 6 formally named and 8 proposed Chlamydiae families (Pillonel et al, 2018; Taylor-Brown et al, 2015), and several other recently discovered novel clades from marine sediments (Dharamshi et al, 2020). The D. discoideum Chlamydiae endosymbionts do not appear to be closely related (<97% sequence match) to any of these groups.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Haplotypes 6, 7 and 8 fall in different places in the phylogeny and do not group closely with any other taxa, although these haplotypes are based on only 220bp of sequence information so their taxonomic identity is less clear. Finally, while the newly discovered marine Chlamydiae lineages (Dharamshi et al, 2020) were not included in this phylogeny, when we aligned our Chlamydiae haplotypes with these sequences, the closest match had only an 89% sequence identity.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, within the Chlamydiaceae family there are lineages that have evolved intracellular associations with eukaryotes (77,78). Recent metagenomic studies uncovered that extensive metabolic capabilities were present in the common ancestor of environmental Chlamydiia (class) and subsequently lost in Chlamydiaceae (79). Moreover, host-associated bacterial genomes show a variation in size depending on the type of host (plant, animal, etc.)…”
Section: Environmental Impact On Genome Size In Different Taxonomic Lmentioning
confidence: 99%