1975
Marihuana and Setting
Search citation statements
Paper Sections
Select...
21
1
1
0
Citation Types
0
3
0
0
Year Published
1975
2024
Publication Types
Select...
18
4
1
Relationship
1
22
Authors
Journals
Cited by 23 publications
(3 citation statements)
References 4 publications
0
3
0
0
“…Although we found a considerable variation in responses be-tween individuals, the effect of the setting in which the drug was given was relatively negligible, at least with doses of marihuana having appreciable pharmacologic effects. 5 The present study suggests that these variations in response cannot be accounted for on the basis of differences in the rate of drug metabolism. Another alternative explanation for the variability of response is the difference in expectations (what psychologists call "set") about the drug effect among various subjects.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 61%
“…Although we found a considerable variation in responses be-tween individuals, the effect of the setting in which the drug was given was relatively negligible, at least with doses of marihuana having appreciable pharmacologic effects. 5 The present study suggests that these variations in response cannot be accounted for on the basis of differences in the rate of drug metabolism. Another alternative explanation for the variability of response is the difference in expectations (what psychologists call "set") about the drug effect among various subjects.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 61%
“…The axiom is seldom tested. A study of marijuana and placebo cigarettes smoked under "favorable" and "unfavorable" conditions found no appreciable contribution of the extreme settings in which the drug was taken (Hollister et al 1975). Quite possibly, the psychological expectations or "set" of subjects are the major determinant of interindividual differences.…”
Section: Personalitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…somatic disposition (Broadhurst, 1975), previous experiences (Rushton et al, 1968) and personality factors (Eysenck, 1966, Claridge andBirchall, 1973); the importance of the experimental setting, i.e. the general condition during the experiment {Naditch et al, 1975), recently was questioned (Hollister et al, 1975).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
