Marginal tissue reactions at osseointegrated titanium fixtures

Adell, R; Lekholm, Ulf; Rockler, B.; Brånemark, Per‐Ingvar; Lindhe, Jan; Eriksson, Bengt O.; Sbordone, Ludovico

doi:10.1016/s0300-9785(86)80010-2

Cited by 469 publications

(359 citation statements)

References 21 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

311

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…The formation of a biologic width can lead to a circumferential crater around the implant shoulder [4,8,9]. In areas of thin bone, the development of a crater may result in the loss of crestal bone height and gingival recession.…”

Section: Crestal Bone Remodelingmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Since the early studies of Brånemark et al [2], osseointegrated implants have become the therapy of choice to rehabilitate edentulous ridges. Success rates are very high, as proven by the longitudinal studies of Adell et al [3,4] Concise success criteria were established in earlier studies. They stated that the vertical bone loss at the implant crestal sites should, on average, be less than 1.0 mm following the first year of implants in function, and should not exceed 0.2 mm in subsequent years [5,6].…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 98%

See 1 more Smart Citation

X-ray evaluation at 5–6 years of Straumann implants (part 2)

Gheddaf-Dam

Najm²,

Lysitsa

et al. 2010

Med Buccale Chir Buccale

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

-The loss of bone around implants is, on an average, below 1 mm during the first year and 0.2 mm per year in the years that follow. It essentially depends upon biomechanical factors but the level at which the bone stabilizes is determines by the implant depth. Intraoral radiographs (paralleling technique) are considered as the "firs choice2 for the evaluation of the radiolucency with respect to the proximal peri-implant bone. This study was based on 528 implants placesd in private practice, with an objective to determine their success rate and their survival at 5-6 years, to evaluate the peri-implant proximal bone loss and outline the factors that could influence this bone loss. The results obtained from 411 accessible patient files are in accordance with the literature date (at 5-6 years, the survival rate is 99.2%, the success rate is 93%, the average bone los sis 1.16 mm). The bone loss was more severe in smokers and in implants with a TPS surface, those placed in the anterior regions or those with vestibular cortical bone below the 1 mm. Short implants were not associated with a more severe bone loss than longer implants.

show abstract

Section: Crestal Bone Remodelingmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 98%

X-ray evaluation at 5–6 years of Straumann implants (part 2)

Gheddaf-Dam

Najm²,

Lysitsa

et al. 2010

Med Buccale Chir Buccale

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…5,[8][9][10][11] The measuring error of 0.13 ± 0.01 mm on repeatedly taken dental radiographs has to make one cautious in drawing definitive conclusions based on radiograph measurements with a short follow-up. However, changes in MBL less than 0.20 mm are not considered clinically relevant.…”

Section: Measuring Errors (Mm Mean ± ± Sd) As Calculated For Each Sementioning

confidence: 99%

A Technique for Standardized Evaluation of Soft and Hard Peri‐Implant Tissues in Partially Edentulous Patients

Meijndert

Meijer

Raghoebar

et al. 2004

Journal of Periodontology

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Background: There is a growing need to evaluate the esthetics of implant‐supported crowns and bridges. An important tool for such an evaluation is standardized assessment of the soft and hard peri‐implant tissue levels.Methods: A simple acrylic device has been developed for reliable and reproducible assessment of soft and hard periimplant tissues using standardized color slides and standardized dental x‐rays. With this device, changes in both the soft and hard tissues around implant‐supported crowns can be evaluated as a function of time. The reproducibility of the technique was tested on color slides as well as on dental x‐rays in a series of implant‐supported crowns and their neighboring teeth. Results: The reproducibility of this technique was excellent. The measuring errors for repeated measurements of the soft and hard tissues were 0.14 ± 0.02 mm and 0.13 ± 0.01 mm, respectively.Conclusions: The device is a reliable tool to assess changes in both soft and hard tissues around crowns and implants over time. Likewise, it is suggested that this technique also can be used to objectively assess soft and hard tissue changes around natural teeth with or without prosthetic restorations. J Periodontol 2004;75:646‐651.

show abstract

“…An average of crestal bone loss of 0.9-1.6 mm is noted during the first postsurgical year and then a yearly loss of 0.02-0.15 mm is observed. 1 Treatment of peri-implantitis, can be both conservative as well as surgical therapies. Conservative therapy includes medication and manual treatment with curettes, ultrasonic and air polishing systems, advance techniques such as laser-supported and photodynamic therapy.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%