2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.chemphys.2015.09.005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Marcus model of spontaneous point mutation in DNA

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
15
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
0
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…DPT reaction does not show any mutagenic effects. The structural mechanisms for spontaneous point mutations (Turaeva and Brown-Kennerly, 2015) in DNA occur through the transitions and transversions, and various enzymatic complexes for DNA lesions are involved in the repair process, such as DNA glycolases, polymerases, and photolyases (Fromme et al, 2004; Braithwaite et al, 2005). The stable canonical NAB pairs were studied to understand the mechanism of genetic code (Blancafort et al, 2005; Chen and Li, 2005; Marian, 2005; Perun et al, 2005; Tomić et al, 2005).…”
Section: Proton Transfer In Nucleobasesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…DPT reaction does not show any mutagenic effects. The structural mechanisms for spontaneous point mutations (Turaeva and Brown-Kennerly, 2015) in DNA occur through the transitions and transversions, and various enzymatic complexes for DNA lesions are involved in the repair process, such as DNA glycolases, polymerases, and photolyases (Fromme et al, 2004; Braithwaite et al, 2005). The stable canonical NAB pairs were studied to understand the mechanism of genetic code (Blancafort et al, 2005; Chen and Li, 2005; Marian, 2005; Perun et al, 2005; Tomić et al, 2005).…”
Section: Proton Transfer In Nucleobasesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We established from the physico-chemical point of view that the generally accepted mechanism of the DPT along intermolecular H-bonds [22][23][24][25][26][27][28][29] cannot be the source of formation of mutagenic tautomers of DNA bases in the А•T(WC) and G•C(WC) Watson-Crick (socalled Löwdin's mechanism) [51][52][53] and G•T(w) wobble [54] base pairs, and also in the m 1 T•CH 3 COOH, m 9 A•CH 3 COOH, m 1 C•CH 3 COOH and m 9 G•CH 3 COOH complexes by the participation of DNA bases and side chains of the amino acids (m-methyl group) [55].…”
Section: Classical Mechanisms Of Dna Base Tautomerization Via Dpt Alomentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Despite great advances in experimental, in particular X-ray analysis [14,15], NMR, in particular relaxation dispersion measurements [11][12][13][16][17][18], and theoretical [19][20][21] investigations, there is no unique approach to the physico-chemical mechanisms enabling DNA bases in the canonical tautomeric form to acquire rare or mutagenic tautomeric form before the dissociation of the Watson-Crick nucleobase pairs into the monomers by the replication machinery in order to produce mispairs resulting in further misincorporations and as a result the spontaneous point mutations at the DNA replication. It is generally accepted in the literature that mutagenic tautomers of the DNA bases can arise via the double proton transfer (DPT) along intermolecular H-bonds in the Watson-Crick [22][23][24][25] and wobble [26] base pairs, and also in the protein-DNA complexes [27]. However, some authors also consider as the source of the origin of the spontaneous transitions the formation of the ionized DNA base pairs [28].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Shortly after the establishment of the spatial organization of the DNA molecule by James Watson and Francis Crick (Watson and Crick, 1953a , b ), the tautomeric hypothesis was formulated (Watson and Crick, 1953b ; Crick and Watson, 1954 ), which considers the transformation or transition of the nucleotide bases from the main (canonical) into the rare (mutagenic) tautomeric form as the main source of the origin of spontaneous point mutations. Since that time, the topic of tautomerism has remained active over the decades to the present day (Löwdin, 1963 , 1966 ; Topal and Fresco, 1976 ; Florian et al, 1994 ; Gorb et al, 2004 ; Brovarets' et al, 2014 ; Godbeer et al, 2015 ; Turaeva and Brown-Kennerly, 2015 ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%