2005
DOI: 10.1016/j.obhdp.2005.03.005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Marching to the beat of a different drummer: Examining the impact of pacing congruence

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

6
157
1

Year Published

2010
2010
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 153 publications
(164 citation statements)
references
References 66 publications
6
157
1
Order By: Relevance
“…However, this congruence presumably would have greater effects on a student for whom this was highly important (high need, high supply) than for one for whom this was not important (low need, low supply). This argument is consistent with person-job fit studies suggesting that fit at higher levels of both person and job components are generally associated with more positive employee outcomes than fit at lower levels (Jansen and Kristof-Brown 2005;Livingstone et al 1997). Therefore, we predict that:…”
Section: Research Hypothesessupporting
confidence: 89%
“…However, this congruence presumably would have greater effects on a student for whom this was highly important (high need, high supply) than for one for whom this was not important (low need, low supply). This argument is consistent with person-job fit studies suggesting that fit at higher levels of both person and job components are generally associated with more positive employee outcomes than fit at lower levels (Jansen and Kristof-Brown 2005;Livingstone et al 1997). Therefore, we predict that:…”
Section: Research Hypothesessupporting
confidence: 89%
“…In an organizational context, fit can be assessed in a variety of ways. Accordingly, prior studies have investigated person-group fit 9 (Jansen and Kristof-Brown, 2005), person-job fit (Donavan et al, 2004) and personorganization fit (Kristof, 1996). Since there are various types of and different ways of assessing fit, it is useful to specify the type of fit being considered in a study.…”
Section: Fit Theorymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Second, polychronicity might lead to higher levels of individual performance, but only for those individuals whose polychronicity levels "fit" or are appropriate for the environment or job. This person-environment fit argument has been raised by several authors (e.g., Bluedorn & Jaussi, 2007;Jansen & Kristof-Brown, 2005) and contains two corollaries: (1) neither polychronicity nor monochronicity is per se better for performance; and (2) polychronicity is better for performance only if the environment demands multitasking. In particular, jobs that have high multitasking requirements would benefit from polychronic employees, whereas other jobs would benefit from monochronic.…”
Section: Polychronicity and Performancementioning
confidence: 99%