2018
DOI: 10.1029/2017jb015208
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Marchenko‐Based Target Replacement, Accounting for All Orders of Multiple Reflections

Abstract: In seismic monitoring, one is usually interested in the response of a changing target zone, embedded in a static inhomogeneous medium. We introduce an efficient method that predicts reflection responses at the Earth's surface for different target‐zone scenarios, from a single reflection response at the surface and a model of the changing target zone. The proposed process consists of two main steps. In the first step, the response of the original target zone is removed from the reflection response, using the Ma… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1

Relationship

5
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Since all orders of internal multiples are accounted for, the redatumed wavefields are free from any interactions of the overburden, hence providing an unobstructed view of the primary reflections of the reservoir when a focal level just above the reservoir is chosen. The Marchenko equations can then be applied a second time to the newly found reflection response to also remove underburden interactions (Wapenaar & Staring, 2018). If the second focal depth is chosen just below the reservoir, the final result has effectively isolated all primaries and multiples of the reservoir.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since all orders of internal multiples are accounted for, the redatumed wavefields are free from any interactions of the overburden, hence providing an unobstructed view of the primary reflections of the reservoir when a focal level just above the reservoir is chosen. The Marchenko equations can then be applied a second time to the newly found reflection response to also remove underburden interactions (Wapenaar & Staring, 2018). If the second focal depth is chosen just below the reservoir, the final result has effectively isolated all primaries and multiples of the reservoir.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition to removing the overburden, the reservoir response can completely be isolated by also removing the underburden with the Marchenko method (Wapenaar and Staring, 2018). Consequently, not only the primary response of the reservoir is uncovered, but internal multiples, which traversed through the reservoir more than once, will now also be clearly visible and unobstructed by primaries and multiples outside the target zone.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A single Marchenko method does not exist, and we consider this understanding a concept rather than a method. Many other methods have been derived from this concept, such as fracture compliance characterization (Minato and Ghose, 2016), target‐oriented velocity analysis (Mildner et al ., 2017), extended imaging and inversion (van der Neut et al ., 2017b; Cui, 2020) and monitoring (Wapenaar and Staring, 2018), homogeneous Green's function retrieval (Wapenaar et al., 2016), equations for inverse source problems (van der Neut et al ., 2017a), virtual acoustics (Wapenaar et al ., 2018) and immersive wave simulation (Elison et al ., 2018). Most field test results are with two‐dimensional (2D) implementations on line data (Jia et al ., 2018; Staring et al ., 2018; Brackenhoff et al ., 2019).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%