2008
DOI: 10.1016/j.geoderma.2007.11.011
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Mapping within-field soil drainage using remote sensing, DEM and apparent soil electrical conductivity

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
29
0
1

Year Published

2009
2009
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 55 publications
(30 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
0
29
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…This supervised classification method has shown good performance in several works [17,52]. Two classification rules were created: the first one was used to predict the TFS-1 map and the second to predict the TFS-2 map.…”
Section: Digital Mapping Strategymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This supervised classification method has shown good performance in several works [17,52]. Two classification rules were created: the first one was used to predict the TFS-1 map and the second to predict the TFS-2 map.…”
Section: Digital Mapping Strategymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The EM38 and Veris-3100 are commonly used in soil apparent electrical conductivity mapping (e.g. Bramley, 2001;Liu et al, 2008). These methods can map soil ECa at two different depths, the EM38 in horizontal and vertical dipole mode can measure soil ECa at roughly 0-75 cm and 0-150 cm, respectively, and the Veris-3100 usually measures at 0-30 cm and 0-90 cm.…”
Section: Geophysics -Gpr and Multi-frequency Emi Surveysmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Different statistical techniques have been used to predict various soil properties from a variety of data sources (e.g. James et al, 2003;McBratney et al, 2003 and references therein;Liu et al, 2008;Grunwald, 2009). For example, logistic regression can be used to make continuous soil maps of soil groups influenced by topography (Debella-Gilo & Etzelmüller, 2009) and to quantify relationships between ancillary variables and soil maps (Kempen et al, 2009).…”
Section: Geophysics -Gpr and Multi-frequency Emi Surveysmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To evaluate site-specific spatiotemporal variable soil properties at the field-scale, many functional soil mapping models and approaches based on digital elevation models (DEM), proximal and/or remote sensing (RS) data have been designed. Compared with geostatistical and spatial interpolation methods (e.g., Kriging procedures, fuzzy clustering algorithms) based on comprehensive, time-consuming, and costly field surveys and soil sampling, non-invasive remote and proximal sensors, combined with empirical-or physical-based data analysis, offer potentially more effective, quick, and cost-efficient continuous direct or indirect data on physiochemical soil characteristics, which are determined by spatial, temporal or spectral sensor resolutions [1,6,[11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18]. Due to the advantages of existing, easily accessible data archives, relatively low-cost and high-temporal, high-spatial resolution multispectral imagery and time series are available for qualitative and partly-quantitative soil information extraction, deduction of soil patterns, and mapping of SSM zones and soil surface units [7,15].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%