Mapping of variations in child stunting, wasting and underweight within the states of India: the Global Burden of Disease Study 2000–2017

Abstract

Background: To inform actions at the district level under the National Nutrition Mission (NNM), we assessed the prevalence trends of child growth failure (CGF) indicators for all districts in India and inequality between districts within the states. Methods: We assessed the trends of CGF indicators (stunting, wasting and underweight) from 2000 to 2017 across the districts of India, aggregated from 5 £ 5 km grid estimates, using all accessible data from various surveys with subnational geographical information. The states were categorised into three groups using their Sociodemographic Index (SDI) levels calculated as part of the Global Burden of Disease Study based on per capita income, mean education and fertility rate in women younger than 25 years. Inequality between districts within the states was assessed using coefficient of variation (CV). We projected the prevalence of CGF indicators for the districts up to 2030 based on the trends from 2000 to 2017 to compare with the NNM 2022 targets for stunting and underweight, and the WHO/UNICEF 2030 targets for stunting and wasting. We assessed Pearson correlation coefficient between two major national surveys for district-level estimates of CGF indicators in the states. Findings: The prevalence of stunting ranged 3.8-fold from 16.4% (95% UI 15.2À17.8) to 62.8% (95% UI 61.5À64.0) among the 723 districts of India in 2017, wasting ranged 5.4-fold from 5.5% (95% UI 5.1À6.1) to 30.0% (95% UI 28.2À31.8), and underweight ranged 4.6-fold from 11.0% (95% UI 10.5À11.9) to 51.0% (95% UI 49.9À52.1). 36.1% of the districts in India had stunting prevalence 40% or more, with 67.0% districts in the low SDI states group and only 1.1% districts in the high SDI states with this level of stunting. The prevalence of stunting declined significantly from 2010 to 2017 in 98.5% of the districts with a maximum decline of 41.2% (95% UI 40.3À42.5), wasting in 61.3% with a maximum decline of 44.0% (95% UI 42.3À46.7), and underweight in 95.0% with a maximum decline of 53.9% (95% UI 52.8À55.4). The CV varied 7.4-fold for stunting, 12.2-fold for wasting, and 8.6-fold for underweight between the states in 2017; the CV increased for stunting in 28 out of 31 states, for wasting in 16 states, and for underweight in 20 states from 2000 to 2017. In order to reach the NNM 2022 targets for stunting and underweight individually, 82.6% and 98.5% of the districts in India would need a rate of improvement higher than they had up to 2017, respectively. To achieve the WHO/UNICEF 2030 target for wasting, all districts in India would need a rate of improvement higher than they had up to 2017. The correlation between the two national surveys for district-level estimates was poor, with Pearson correlation coefficient of 0.7 only in Odisha and four small north-eastern states out of the 27 states covered by these surveys. Interpretation: CGF indicators have improved in India, but there are substantial variations between the districts in their magnitude and rate of decline, and the inequality between districts has inc...

Multilevel analysis of geographic variation among correlates of child undernutrition in India

“…Thus, our findings suggest that the decision about which geographic unit health interventions should be targeted at depends on the state and the risk factor. Finally, findings from previous studies show that Bihar, Jharkhand, Madhya Pradesh, and Uttar Pradesh are among the worst performing Indian states in terms of child malnutrition outcomes (Hemalatha et al, 2020;Swaminathan et al, 2019). Our findings show that each of these were the only states in the highest risk quintile for more than 10 of the 21 risk factors for child undernutrition.…”

Geospatial estimation of reproductive, maternal, newborn and child health indicators: a systematic review of methodological aspects of studies based on household surveys

“…The use of multiple modeling techniques allows any complex non-linear effects of the covariates to be captured, while the final predictions are estimated using a robust, consolidated modeling technique. All 11 studies following this approach [27][28][29][30][31][32][33][34][35][36][37] used a Bayesian hierarchical model fitted using INLA for the final predictions. Only one study relied on ensemble models and did not perform stacked generalization [38].…”

“…The burden of stunting, wasting, underweight and overweight was estimated for the entire African continent [28] and in all LMICs [27,37]. There were also several single country studies that account for and focus on local specificities as done in Bangladesh [98], Afghanistan [99], Cambodia [100], India [36], Mexico [101] and Ethiopia [24,102]. Five studies generated estimates at district or province level [98][99][100]102], four studies at 1x1km [45], 5x5km [27,28] and 10x10km [103], and two studies at both 5x5km and administrative level [36,37].…”

Changes in socio-economic inequality in nutritional status among children in EAG states, India

“…The prevalence of stunting, wasting and underweight reportedly were 38 %, 21 % and 36 %, respectively, in 2015-2016 (9) . Undernutrition is unacceptably higher in many states, with stark and vast differences between and within states and by population groups in India (9)(10)(11)(12) .…”