Landslide Science and Practice 2013
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-642-31319-6_47
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Mapping Geological at-Risk Areas in the City of São Paulo: Issues and Results from the Largest Risk Survey in Brazil

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Besides these analyses, other approach was adopted, based on the "risk levels" terminology used by CPRM, and considered by some recent studies (Listo and Vieira, 2012;Pascarelli et al, 2011). The classification considering "risk levels" provided by CPRM considers a hierarchical categorization of risk sectors, regarding the probability of landslide occurrence and its potential impacts.…”
Section: Validation Of Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Besides these analyses, other approach was adopted, based on the "risk levels" terminology used by CPRM, and considered by some recent studies (Listo and Vieira, 2012;Pascarelli et al, 2011). The classification considering "risk levels" provided by CPRM considers a hierarchical categorization of risk sectors, regarding the probability of landslide occurrence and its potential impacts.…”
Section: Validation Of Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(Online), São Paulo, v.18, n.4, (Out-Dez) p.719-735, 2017 In Brazil, several governmental institutions and scientifi c groups have suggested guidelines for assessing landslide susceptibility, using mainly geomorphological analyses (e.g. Macedo et al 2013;Pascarelli et al 2013) as well as deterministic approaches (e.g. Listo and Vieira 2012;Michel et al 2014;Nery and Vieira 2015).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%