2015 IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV) 2015
DOI: 10.1109/iccv.2015.256
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

MAP Disparity Estimation Using Hidden Markov Trees

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This work was later extended and implemented on graphics hardware for real-time performance [8]. Psota et al [28] utilized Hidden Markov Trees (HMT) to create minimum spanning trees based on color information which allows aggregated costs to be passed along the tree branches, and the isolated mismatches were later moved by median filtering.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This work was later extended and implemented on graphics hardware for real-time performance [8]. Psota et al [28] utilized Hidden Markov Trees (HMT) to create minimum spanning trees based on color information which allows aggregated costs to be passed along the tree branches, and the isolated mismatches were later moved by median filtering.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since a large set of (a) training (b) testing Figure 9. Comparison with the top ten approaches on the Middlebury Stereo Evaluation site [29]: SED [23], R-NCC (unpublished work), r200high [15], ICSG [33], SGM [11], DF (unpublished work), MotionStereo (unpublished work), IDR [17], TMAP [28] and SNCC [6]. Performances of different approaches on both training (a) and testing (b) datasets are plotted on non-occlusion error rates v.s.…”
Section: Matching-net Evaluation-net Attributes Kernel Size Quantitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…3) Post-processing: We follow the same post-processing scheme as mentioned in the PMS [8]. Additionally, we apply a median filter on each pixel of the resulting disparity map to eliminate any isolated mismatches [36].…”
Section: ) Initialisationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Our unoptimised C implementation of PMS takes around 150 minutes to process an image of size 900 × 750 pixels whereas IPMS is approximately five times more expensive but still comparable to global methods such as [36]. The main reason for the additional computational time is the inclusion of the search image support weight in the cost function, which reduces false matching in occluded regions.…”
Section: B Comparison With Pmsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…At the same time, the need for high resolution stereo images is on the rise [18,19]. However, there is a lack of research on imperfect rectification in stereo matching and most previous studies [20][21][22][23][24][25][26][27][28] are not aware of the problem of high resolution images.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%