2017
DOI: 10.1007/s10530-017-1481-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Many eyes on the ground: citizen science is an effective early detection tool for biosecurity

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
27
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 40 publications
(29 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
0
27
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The potential surveillance power of the general public is evident from a New Zealand study, where nearly half of all new exotic species detections over a 3-year period were from members of the general public (Froud et al 2008). In a similar vein, Thomas et al (2017) recorded that 95% of non-indigenous invertebrate species new to Barrow Island were detected by members of the local community. Such surveillance contributes to what is termed "general surveillance" (Hammond et al 2016a).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 77%
“…The potential surveillance power of the general public is evident from a New Zealand study, where nearly half of all new exotic species detections over a 3-year period were from members of the general public (Froud et al 2008). In a similar vein, Thomas et al (2017) recorded that 95% of non-indigenous invertebrate species new to Barrow Island were detected by members of the local community. Such surveillance contributes to what is termed "general surveillance" (Hammond et al 2016a).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 77%
“…The 'many eyes hypothesis' has been used to describe the efficiency of marine citizen science in generating data across vast spatio-temporal scales and across multiple taxa (Hochachka et al 1999;Dickinson et al 2012;Thomas et al 2017). This hypothesis, in the case of animal aggregations, shows a larger group size has extended individual feeding times and an increased likelihood of detecting predators compared to smaller groups (Lima 1995).…”
Section: The Many Eyes Hypothesismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This hypothesis, in the case of animal aggregations, shows a larger group size has extended individual feeding times and an increased likelihood of detecting predators compared to smaller groups (Lima 1995). When applied to citizen science, it demonstrates that a network of citizen scientists with clearly defined protocols and realistic survey aims is capable of surveying vast areas (Ponti et al 2011b;Cerrano et al 2012Cerrano et al , 2017, which increases the chances of detection of a species/phenomenon, increases replication rates and decreases individual effort (Hochachka et al 1999;Thomas et al 2017). This 'many eyes' effect has allowed citizen science to benefit landscape ecology and macroecology research by covering extensive spatio-temporal scales (Parmesan and Yohe 2003;Southward et al 2005;Dickinson et al 2010Dickinson et al , 2012Mieszkowska et al 2014;Schläppy et al 2017), alongside providing an efficient means for detecting species with low abundances (e.g.…”
Section: The Many Eyes Hypothesismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, residents were encouraged to report any fauna (specifically arthropods) sightings to Chevron quarantine management. Adherence to biosecurity protocols and a strong biosecurity culture amongst personnel aided the eradication campaign 41 . Unauthorised consumption of food occurred in only a few cabins, but this was not considered to have impacted on the success of the eradication effort.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%