Manual timing in physics experiments: Error and uncertainty

Abstract

Manual digital timing devices such as stopwatches are ubiquitous in the education sector for experimental work where automated electronic timing is unavailable or impractical. The disadvantage of manual timing is that the experimenter introduces an additional systematic error and random uncertainty to a measurement that hitherto could only be approximated and which masks useful information on uncertainty due to variations in the physical conditions of the experiment. A model for the reaction time of a timekeeper using a stopwatch for a single anticipated visual stimulus of the type encountered in physics experiments is obtained from a set of 4304 reaction times from timekeepers at swimming competitions. The reaction time is found to be well modelled by the normal distribution N (, σ 2) = N (0.11, 0.07 2) in units of seconds where and σ 2 are the systematic error and variance for a single time measurement. Consistency between timekeepers is shown to be very good. The reaction time for a stopwatch-operated start and stop experiment can therefore be modelled by N (0, 0.10 2), assuming that the average reaction time is the same in both cases. This makes a significant contribution to the uncertainty of most manually-timed measurements. This timing uncertainty can be subtracted out of the variation observed in repeat measurements in the real experiment to reveal the uncertainty solely associated with fluctuations in the physical conditions of the experiment.

The Penn Vet Working Dog Center Fit to Work Program: A Formalized Method for Assessing and Developing Foundational Canine Physical Fitness

“…Due to the need for precise measurement and the inherent margin of error with manual timing the ST must be recorded using a video camera capable of at least 30 frames per second (accurate to 0.033 s) and preferably 60 frames per second (accurate to 0.017 s) ( 54 ). The camera should be positioned in line with the finish line and out of the way of the dog's path.…”

The floating point: Tales of the unexpected

“…In 2019, we estimated the characteristic human reaction time for a manually-operated timing device from 4304 swimming competition race times obtained where races were started electronically and finished both electronically and manually. 37 We found that the reaction time for a single manual time measurement was modeled by a normal distribution with a mean of 0.…”

“…A difference of 0.1 s is of similar order to the expected variation of human reaction time for a stopwatch. 37 The presentation of the incorrect display digit is not a property of the particular algorithm used here. Any truncation algorithm would have the same issues of rounding.…”

Noise-aware physics-informed machine learning for robust PDE discovery

“…As a proof of concept distinct from prior works, we conduct investigations on learning from noisy independent variables, e.g. polluted spatial and temporal variables, which are relevant to Global Positioning System (GPS) coordinate measurements [20] and manual timing in physical experiments [21].…”